IWR ranks 4th and EZM 9th of 13 funds in the US Mid-Cap Category.
EZM vs IWR
IWR −0.20pt a year
0.38%0.18%
IWR 99.7×the volume
17.9K1.79M
IWR +0.8pt
+10.8%+11.6%
EZM vs IWR Performance
+47.9%+42.1%
- EZM 0.38%
- IWR 0.18%, better
- EZM $940M
- IWR $58.1B
- EZM +17.1%, better
- IWR +16.3%
- EZM 1.21%, better
- IWR 1.16%
- EZM 506
- IWR 827
- EZM 17.9K sh
- IWR 1.79M sh, better
- EZM $74.91
- IWR $110.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EZM | IWR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | C43Higher |
| Mission | A96 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C49 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | D28 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | A83Higher |
| Durability | C47 | A86Higher |
Rank among US Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. EZM and IWR are both graded against the same 13 US Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EZMC
IWRA
In short
EZM A 2007-vintage twist on mid caps: EZM's index only takes U.S. companies that actually generate earnings, then holds roughly 600 of them. Profit screen first, size second.
IWR The Russell mid-cap standard: roughly 800 mid-sized US companies in one ticker, tracked since 2001. Big, heavily traded, and priced a notch above the index-fund floor.
Stated mandate
EZM The fund seeks to track earnings-generating mid-cap companies in the U.S. equity market.
IWR The fund seeks to track an index composed of mid-sized U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EZM vs IWR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EZM vs IWR Cost
Overpaying EZM vs IWR
$3,957
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EZM 0.38%
$7,706
IWR 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EZM | IWR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $328 | $360 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $1,281 | $1,377 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $3,749 | $3,957 |
- 0.38%EZM
- 0.18%IWR, cheaper
- Middle half of US Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.15%
IWR 8th cheapest of 13 funds
EZM 10th cheapest of 13 funds
EZM vs IWR Dividends
- EZM 1.21%, better
- IWR 1.16%
- EZM $0.90
- IWR $1.27
- EZM $0.22
- IWR $0.33
- EZM Sep 25, 2026
- IWR Sep 15, 2026
- EZM Sep 29, 2026
- IWR Sep 18, 2026
- EZM Quarterly
- IWR Quarterly
Distribution history
EZM vs IWR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EZM
- IWR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EZM 16.0%IWR 14.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EZM 0.83IWR 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- EZM −23.5%, betterIWR −26.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EZM 1.02IWR 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.