EZU ranks 2nd and GREK 11th of 12 funds in the Europe Region Category.
EZU vs GREK
EZU −0.06pt a year
0.50%0.56%
EZU 15.6×the volume
977K62.7K
GREK +7.5pt
+9.5%+17.0%
EZU vs GREK Performance
+49.7%+233.2%
- EZU 0.50%, better
- GREK 0.56%
- EZU $9.13B
- GREK $332M
- EZU +7.7%
- GREK +31.1%, better
- EZU 2.83%, better
- GREK 2.46%
- EZU 220
- GREK 35
- EZU 977K sh, better
- GREK 62.7K sh
- EZU $65.37
- GREK $80.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EZU | GREK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B59 |
| Risk | C46Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | F17 |
| Durability | A81Higher | D38 |
Rank among Europe Region funds
Same Category. EZU and GREK are both graded against the same 12 Europe Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EZUA
GREKC
In short
EZU Europe minus the UK, Switzerland and the Nordics. EZU holds only developed countries that use the euro, about 220 large and mid caps, and it has been doing that job since 2000.
GREK Greece in one ticker. Launched in 2011 with Athens at the center of Europe's debt crisis, GREK is still the only US-listed ETF built to hold Greek stocks directly: roughly 30 names, with banks in the driver's seat.
Stated mandate
EZU The fund seeks to track an index of large- and mid-cap equities from developed countries that use the euro, providing diversified Eurozone equity exposure.
GREK The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI All Greece Select 25/50 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EZU vs GREK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EZU vs GREK Cost
Overpaying GREK vs EZU
$1,109
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EZU 0.50%
$9,979
GREK 0.56%
$11,088
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EZU | GREK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,006 | $106 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,855 | $395 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $11,088 | $1,109 |
- 0.50%EZU, cheaper
- 0.56%GREK
- Middle half of Europe Region funds
- Median 0.51%
EZU 5th cheapest of 12 funds
GREK 8th cheapest of 12 funds
EZU vs GREK Dividends
- EZU 2.83%, better
- GREK 2.46%
- EZU $1.84
- GREK $1.95
- EZU $1.23
- GREK $0.55
- EZU Jun 15, 2026
- GREK Jun 29, 2026
- EZU Jun 18, 2026
- GREK Jul 7, 2026
- EZU Twice a year
- GREK Twice a year
Distribution history
EZU vs GREK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EZU
- GREK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EZU 13.9%, betterGREK 18.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- EZU 1.06GREK 1.60, better
- Worst fall
- EZU −36.0%GREK −30.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EZU 0.91GREK 0.83
EZU and GREK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



