IUSV ranks 3rd and FAB 26th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
FAB vs IUSV
IUSV −0.62pt a year
0.66%0.04%
IUSV 36.2×the volume
15.9K575K
IUSV +1.3pt
+11.0%+12.3%
FAB vs IUSV Performance
+60.7%+72.6%
- FAB 0.66%
- IUSV 0.04%, better
- FAB $165M
- IUSV $28.5B
- FAB +26.9%, better
- IUSV +16.6%
- FAB 1.65%, better
- IUSV 1.63%
- FAB 675
- IUSV 734
- FAB 15.9K sh
- IUSV 575K sh, better
- FAB $106.67
- IUSV $115.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAB | IUSV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F8 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A93Higher | A88 |
| Risk | C45 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | C48 |
| Durability | C52 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. FAB and IUSV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FABC
IUSVA
In short
FAB One of the original 2007 AlphaDEX funds: rather than buying value by size, it scores stocks on value and growth factors, cuts the weakest ranks, and tier-weights the roughly 700 survivors across large, mid and small caps.
IUSV A value fund with a wider net: it tracks the S&P 900 Value Index, which screens S&P 500 and MidCap 400 stocks on book value, earnings and sales versus price. Roughly 700 names, 0.04% a year, running since 2000.
Stated mandate
FAB The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Multi Cap ValueTM Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in securities comprising that Index.
IUSV The fund seeks to track the S&P 900 Value Index, which represents large- and mid-capitalization U.S. value equities. Value characteristics are identified using book value, earnings, and sales relative to price.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAB vs IUSV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAB vs IUSV Cost
Overpaying FAB vs IUSV
$12,047
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAB 0.66%
$12,896
IUSV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAB | IUSV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $73 | $1,107 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $288 | $4,216 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $849 | $12,047 |
- 0.66%FAB
- 0.04%IUSV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
IUSV 3rd cheapest of 40 funds
FAB 37th cheapest of 40 funds
FAB vs IUSV Dividends
- FAB 1.65%, better
- IUSV 1.63%
- FAB $1.76
- IUSV $1.89
- FAB $0.54
- IUSV $0.49
- FAB Sep 24, 2026
- IUSV Sep 15, 2026
- FAB Sep 30, 2026
- IUSV Sep 18, 2026
- FAB Quarterly
- IUSV Quarterly
Distribution history
FAB vs IUSV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAB
- IUSV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAB 15.5%IUSV 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FAB 0.92IUSV 1.15, better
- Worst fall
- FAB −22.9%IUSV −17.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FAB 0.77IUSV 0.85
FAB and IUSV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
