SCHV ranks 1st and FAB 26th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
FAB vs SCHV
SCHV −0.62pt a year
0.66%0.04%
SCHV 199.6×the volume
15.9K3.17M
SCHV +0.6pt
+11.0%+11.6%
FAB vs SCHV Performance
+60.7%+63.8%
- FAB 0.66%
- SCHV 0.04%, better
- FAB $165M
- SCHV $15.7B
- FAB +26.9%, better
- SCHV +22.1%
- FAB 1.65%
- SCHV 1.81%, better
- FAB 675
- SCHV 568
- FAB 15.9K sh
- SCHV 3.17M sh, better
- FAB $106.67
- SCHV $34.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAB | SCHV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F8 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A93Higher | A88 |
| Risk | C45 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | B59 |
| Durability | C52 | B68Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. FAB and SCHV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FABC
SCHVA
In short
FAB One of the original 2007 AlphaDEX funds: rather than buying value by size, it scores stocks on value and growth factors, cuts the weakest ranks, and tier-weights the roughly 700 survivors across large, mid and small caps.
Stated mandate
FAB The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Multi Cap ValueTM Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in securities comprising that Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAB vs SCHV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAB vs SCHV Cost
Overpaying FAB vs SCHV
$12,047
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAB 0.66%
$12,896
SCHV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAB | SCHV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $73 | $1,107 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $288 | $4,216 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $849 | $12,047 |
- 0.66%FAB
- 0.04%SCHV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
SCHV 3rd cheapest of 40 funds
FAB 37th cheapest of 40 funds
FAB vs SCHV Dividends
- FAB 1.65%
- SCHV 1.81%, better
- FAB $1.76
- SCHV $0.63
- FAB $0.54
- SCHV $0.16
- FAB Sep 24, 2026
- SCHV Sep 23, 2026
- FAB Sep 30, 2026
- SCHV Sep 28, 2026
- FAB Quarterly
- SCHV Quarterly
Distribution history
FAB vs SCHV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAB
- SCHV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAB 15.5%SCHV 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FAB 0.92SCHV 1.31, better
- Worst fall
- FAB −22.9%SCHV −19.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FAB 0.77SCHV 0.76
FAB and SCHV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

