IWD ranks 4th and FAB 26th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
FAB vs IWD
IWD −0.48pt a year
0.66%0.18%
IWD 126.4×the volume
15.9K2.01M
IWD +0.9pt
+11.0%+11.9%
FAB vs IWD Performance
+60.7%+72.9%
- FAB 0.66%
- IWD 0.18%, better
- FAB $165M
- IWD $83.2B
- FAB +26.9%
- IWD +28.4%, better
- FAB 1.65%, better
- IWD 1.37%
- FAB 675
- IWD 874
- FAB 15.9K sh
- IWD 2.01M sh, better
- FAB $106.67
- IWD $258.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAB | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F8 | B59Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C45 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A96Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | C42 |
| Durability | C52 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. FAB and IWD are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FABC
IWDA
In short
FAB One of the original 2007 AlphaDEX funds: rather than buying value by size, it scores stocks on value and growth factors, cuts the weakest ranks, and tier-weights the roughly 700 survivors across large, mid and small caps.
IWD The original Russell 1000 Value tracker, live since 2000 and still one of the most traded ways to own the value half of US large caps. Roughly 900 stocks, followed closely, at a price that reflects the plumbing.
Stated mandate
FAB The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Multi Cap ValueTM Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in securities comprising that Index.
IWD The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks that may be undervalued relative to comparable companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAB vs IWD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAB vs IWD Cost
Overpaying FAB vs IWD
$9,147
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAB 0.66%
$12,896
IWD 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAB | IWD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $328 | $852 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $1,281 | $3,223 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $3,749 | $9,147 |
- 0.66%FAB
- 0.18%IWD, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
IWD 16th cheapest of 40 funds
FAB 37th cheapest of 40 funds
FAB vs IWD Dividends
- FAB 1.65%, better
- IWD 1.37%
- FAB $1.76
- IWD $3.53
- FAB $0.54
- IWD $0.93
- FAB Sep 24, 2026
- IWD Sep 15, 2026
- FAB Sep 30, 2026
- IWD Sep 18, 2026
- FAB Quarterly
- IWD Quarterly
Distribution history
FAB vs IWD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAB
- IWD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAB 15.5%IWD 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FAB 0.92IWD 1.42, better
- Worst fall
- FAB −22.9%IWD −19.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FAB 0.77IWD 0.85
FAB and IWD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





