FAS ranks 3rd and MEXX 30th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
FAS vs MEXX
FAS −0.35pt a year
0.88%1.23%
FAS 33.5×the volume
413K12.3K
MEXX +6.2pt
+5.6%+11.8%
FAS vs MEXX Performance
+31.4%+74.7%
- FAS 0.88%, better
- MEXX 1.23%
- FAS $2.17B
- MEXX $15M
- FAS +12.3%
- MEXX +22.3%, better
- FAS 8.87%, better
- MEXX 1.75%
- FAS 87
- MEXX 10
- FAS 413K sh, better
- MEXX 12.3K sh
- FAS $168.18
- MEXX $25.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAS | MEXX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F7 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | D31 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66Higher | F24 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. FAS and MEXX are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FASA
MEXXF
In short
FAS Born in November 2008 with the banking system on fire, FAS aims to deliver three times the daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A one-day tool on roughly 80 financial stocks, built around a single-day objective.
MEXX While the category's heavyweights lever up US tech and Treasuries, MEXX points 3x daily leverage at Mexico: 300% of the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index's daily move, at 1.23% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
FAS The fund seeks a daily return equal to three times the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a single-day objective rather than a multiple of the index’s cumulative return over longer periods.
MEXX The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAS vs MEXX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAS vs MEXX Cost
Overpaying MEXX vs FAS
$5,606
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAS 0.88%
$16,705
MEXX 1.23%
$22,311
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAS | MEXX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,559 | $2,148 | $589 |
| 20 | $5,891 | $7,989 | $2,098 |
| 30 | $16,705 | $22,311 | $5,606 |
- 0.88%FAS, cheaper
- 1.23%MEXX
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
FAS 4th cheapest of 30 funds
MEXX 28th cheapest of 30 funds
FAS vs MEXX Dividends
- FAS 8.87%, better
- MEXX 1.75%
- FAS $14.62
- MEXX $0.45
- FAS $1.00
- MEXX $0.04
- FAS Sep 22, 2026
- MEXX Sep 22, 2026
- FAS Sep 29, 2026
- MEXX Sep 29, 2026
- FAS Quarterly
- MEXX Quarterly
Distribution history
FAS vs MEXX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAS
- MEXX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAS 46.3%, betterMEXX 61.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FAS 1.03, betterMEXX 0.45
- Worst fall
- FAS −66.9%, betterMEXX −74.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FAS 2.63MEXX 2.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.88% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.23% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.23% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.23% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.