SDOW ranks 2nd and FAZ 6th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
FAZ vs SDOW
SDOW −0.08pt a year
1.03%0.95%
SDOW 4.1×the volume
930K3.85M
SDOW +6.4pt
−44.0%−37.6%
FAZ vs SDOW Performance
−79.4%−73.1%
- FAZ 1.03%
- SDOW 0.95%, better
- FAZ $86M
- SDOW $154M
- FAZ −22.4%
- SDOW −21.9%, better
- FAZ 2.98%
- SDOW 4.76%, better
- FAZ 5
- SDOW 10
- FAZ 930K sh
- SDOW 3.85M sh, better
- FAZ $32.80
- SDOW $25.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAZ | SDOW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B68 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | C53 | B67Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. FAZ and SDOW are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FAZC
SDOWA
In short
FAZ Launched in November 2008, as the banking system was cracking, FAZ aims for 300% of the inverse daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A triple-strength short on financials that starts fresh every trading day.
SDOW The only -3x ETF pointed at the Dow. SDOW aims to deliver three times the inverse of the index's daily move, reset at each close, for 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
FAZ The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses.
SDOW SDOW seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times the inverse of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAZ vs SDOW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAZ vs SDOW Cost
Overpaying FAZ vs SDOW
$1,304
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAZ 1.03%
$19,173
SDOW 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAZ | SDOW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $1,678 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $6,322 | $485 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $17,869 | $1,304 |
- 1.03%FAZ
- 0.95%SDOW, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SDOW 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
FAZ 8th cheapest of 14 funds
FAZ vs SDOW Dividends
- FAZ 2.98%
- SDOW 4.76%, better
- FAZ $1.00
- SDOW $1.19
- FAZ $0.20
- SDOW $0.29
- FAZ Sep 22, 2026
- SDOW Sep 23, 2026
- FAZ Sep 29, 2026
- SDOW Sep 29, 2026
- FAZ Quarterly
- SDOW Quarterly
Distribution history
FAZ vs SDOW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAZ
- SDOW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAZ 42.2%SDOW 34.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FAZ −1.25SDOW −1.22, better
- Worst fall
- FAZ −89.3%SDOW −85.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FAZ −2.11SDOW −2.46
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.