SDOW ranks 2nd and TZA 4th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SDOW vs TZA
0.0%by weight
SDOW −0.04pt a year
0.95%0.99%
TZA 4.6×the volume
3.85M17.8M
SDOW +4.2pt
−37.6%−41.8%
SDOW vs TZA Performance
−73.1%−79.9%
- SDOW 0.95%, better
- TZA 0.99%
- SDOW $154M
- TZA $191M
- SDOW −21.9%, better
- TZA −37.2%
- SDOW 4.76%, better
- TZA 4.06%
- SDOW 10
- TZA 7
- SDOW 3.85M sh
- TZA 17.8M sh, better
- SDOW $25.01
- TZA $44.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SDOW | TZA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | B64 |
| Mission | A78Higher | A75 |
| Risk | B69Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | B67Higher | B60 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SDOW and TZA are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SDOWA
TZAB
In short
SDOW The only -3x ETF pointed at the Dow. SDOW aims to deliver three times the inverse of the index's daily move, reset at each close, for 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
TZA Born in the wreckage of 2008, TZA aims to move three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily swing. A heavily traded way to press a bearish small-cap view, with a daily reset that makes it a tool for days, not quarters.
Stated mandate
SDOW SDOW seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times the inverse of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
TZA The Fund seeks daily inverse leveraged investment results equal to negative three times the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. Its leverage makes it potentially riskier than nonleveraged alternatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SDOW vs TZA Holdings
How SDOW and TZA differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SDOW and 0.0% of TZA.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TZA.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for TZA.
Concentration
- SDOW122.5%
- TZA159.7%
- SDOW10
- TZA0
Asset class
- SDOW
- Equity
- TZA
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in SDOW10
- In both0
- Only in TZA0
Only in SDOW
10 securities, 100% of SDOW by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf77.79%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-2913.80%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-109.88%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-084.61%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-033.31%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-103.30%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-243.29%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-313.28%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-121.97%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-171.32%
Only in TZA
0 securities, 0.0% of TZA by weight
Weight gaps
SDOW and TZA share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SDOW vs TZA Cost
Overpaying TZA vs SDOW
$656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SDOW 0.95%
$17,869
TZA 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SDOW | TZA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,746 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,565 | $243 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,525 | $656 |
- 0.95%SDOW, cheaper
- 0.99%TZA
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SDOW 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
TZA 5th cheapest of 14 funds
SDOW vs TZA Dividends
- SDOW 4.76%, better
- TZA 4.06%
- SDOW $1.19
- TZA $1.90
- SDOW $0.29
- TZA $0.47
- SDOW Sep 23, 2026
- TZA Sep 22, 2026
- SDOW Sep 29, 2026
- TZA Sep 29, 2026
- SDOW Quarterly
- TZA Quarterly
Distribution history
SDOW vs TZA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SDOW
- TZA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SDOW 34.4%, betterTZA 53.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- SDOW −1.22TZA −1.01, better
- Worst fall
- SDOW −85.1%, betterTZA −92.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SDOW −2.46TZA −3.25
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.