SRTY ranks 3rd and FAZ 6th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
FAZ vs SRTY
SRTY −0.08pt a year
1.03%0.95%
SRTY 1.7×the volume
930K1.6M
SRTY +1.2pt
−44.0%−42.8%
FAZ vs SRTY Performance
−79.4%−82.0%
- FAZ 1.03%
- SRTY 0.95%, better
- FAZ $86M
- SRTY $68M
- FAZ −22.4%, better
- SRTY −37.4%
- FAZ 2.98%
- SRTY 5.87%, better
- FAZ 5
- SRTY 5
- FAZ 930K sh
- SRTY 1.6M sh, better
- FAZ $32.80
- SRTY $26.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAZ | SRTY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | B68Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | B61 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C53 | B56Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. FAZ and SRTY are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FAZC
SRTYA
In short
FAZ Launched in November 2008, as the banking system was cracking, FAZ aims for 300% of the inverse daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A triple-strength short on financials that starts fresh every trading day.
SRTY A one-day instrument by design: SRTY aims for three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and it has been the ProShares small-cap bear since 2010.
Stated mandate
FAZ The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses.
SRTY SRTY seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAZ vs SRTY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAZ vs SRTY Cost
Overpaying FAZ vs SRTY
$1,304
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAZ 1.03%
$19,173
SRTY 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAZ | SRTY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $1,678 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $6,322 | $485 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $17,869 | $1,304 |
- 1.03%FAZ
- 0.95%SRTY, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SRTY 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
FAZ 8th cheapest of 14 funds
FAZ vs SRTY Dividends
- FAZ 2.98%
- SRTY 5.87%, better
- FAZ $1.00
- SRTY $1.55
- FAZ $0.20
- SRTY $0.27
- FAZ Sep 22, 2026
- SRTY Sep 23, 2026
- FAZ Sep 29, 2026
- SRTY Sep 29, 2026
- FAZ Quarterly
- SRTY Quarterly
Distribution history
FAZ vs SRTY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAZ
- SRTY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAZ 42.2%, betterSRTY 54.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FAZ −1.25SRTY −1.04, better
- Worst fall
- FAZ −89.3%, betterSRTY −92.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FAZ −2.11SRTY −3.24
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.