SQQQ ranks 1st and FAZ 6th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
FAZ vs SQQQ
SQQQ −0.09pt a year
1.03%0.94%
SQQQ 53.8×the volume
930K50M
FAZ +10.3pt
−44.0%−54.3%
FAZ vs SQQQ Performance
−79.4%−93.7%
- FAZ 1.03%
- SQQQ 0.94%, better
- FAZ $86M
- SQQQ $2.04B
- FAZ −22.4%, better
- SQQQ −32.5%
- FAZ 2.98%
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- FAZ 5
- SQQQ 12
- FAZ 930K sh
- SQQQ 50M sh, better
- FAZ $32.80
- SQQQ $41.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAZ | SQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B68Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B61 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | |
| Durability | C53 | A73Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. FAZ and SQQQ are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FAZC
SQQQA
In short
FAZ Launched in November 2008, as the banking system was cracking, FAZ aims for 300% of the inverse daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A triple-strength short on financials that starts fresh every trading day.
SQQQ The workhorse of the short-Nasdaq trade. Running since 2010, it aims at three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100's daily move, resets every session, and charges 0.94% a year, below the going rate in the 3x bear category.
Stated mandate
FAZ The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses.
SQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100 Index’s daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAZ vs SQQQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAZ vs SQQQ Cost
Overpaying FAZ vs SQQQ
$1,469
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAZ 1.03%
$19,173
SQQQ 0.94%
$17,704
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAZ | SQQQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $1,661 | $153 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $6,260 | $547 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $17,704 | $1,469 |
- 1.03%FAZ
- 0.94%SQQQ, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SQQQ cheapest of 14 funds
FAZ 8th cheapest of 14 funds
FAZ vs SQQQ Dividends
- FAZ 2.98%
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- FAZ $1.00
- SQQQ $3.25
- FAZ $0.20
- SQQQ $0.47
- FAZ Sep 22, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- FAZ Sep 29, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- FAZ Quarterly
- SQQQ Quarterly
Distribution history
FAZ vs SQQQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAZ
- SQQQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAZ 42.2%, betterSQQQ 48.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FAZ −1.25, betterSQQQ −1.42
- Worst fall
- FAZ −89.3%, betterSQQQ −97.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FAZ −2.11SQQQ −3.43
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.