XOVR ranks 4th and FBDC 11th of 12 funds in the Listed Private Markets Category.
FBDC vs XOVR
XOVR −11.61pt a year
12.44%0.83%
XOVR 314.6×the volume
13.3K4.17M
FBDC vs XOVR Performance
−1.9%−7.9%
- FBDC 12.44%
- XOVR 0.83%, better
- FBDC $38M
- XOVR $1.39B
- FBDC −1.9%, better
- XOVR −7.9%
- FBDC 11.71%, better
- XOVR 0.00%
- FBDC 21
- XOVR 33
- FBDC 13.3K sh
- XOVR 4.17M sh, better
- FBDC $16.78
- XOVR $19.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FBDC | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A77 | |
| Risk | C54Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | D33 | D37Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | A72 |
Rank among Listed Private Markets funds
Same Category. FBDC and XOVR are both graded against the same 12 Listed Private Markets funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FBDCD
XOVRB
In short
FBDC First Trust points this one at business development companies and specialty finance lenders, a narrow lending corner of US financials, with income as the stated first job and payouts on a monthly cadence.
XOVR A regular brokerage account, a slice of SpaceX. XOVR wraps about 30 public growth names around select late-stage private stakes held through special-purpose vehicles, with no accredited-investor hoops. Fee: 1.81%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
FBDC The Fund seeks a high level of current income and, secondarily, an attractive total return.
XOVR The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a broader crossover strategy combining public equities with select private-company exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FBDC vs XOVR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FBDC vs XOVR Cost
Overpaying FBDC vs XOVR
$58,396
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FBDC 12.44%
$74,255
XOVR 0.83%
$15,859
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FBDC | XOVR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $13,956 | $1,474 | $12,482 |
| 20 | $35,430 | $5,581 | $29,849 |
| 30 | $74,255 | $15,859 | $58,396 |
- 12.44%FBDC
- 0.83%XOVR, cheaper
- Middle half of Listed Private Markets funds
- Median 2.25%
XOVR 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
FBDC 12th cheapest of 12 funds
FBDC vs XOVR Dividends
- FBDC 11.71%, better
- XOVR 0.00%
- FBDC $1.99
- XOVR None
- FBDC $0.14
- XOVR
- FBDC Oct 21, 2026
- XOVR
- FBDC Oct 30, 2026
- XOVR
- FBDC Monthly
- XOVR
Distribution history
FBDC vs XOVR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FBDC 16.5%XOVR 24.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FBDC −0.50XOVR 0.43
- Worst fall
- FBDC −20.6%XOVR −25.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FBDC 0.48XOVR 1.20
FBDC and XOVR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 12.44% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 12.44% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 12.44% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


