FDEM ranks 3rd and JPEM 6th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FDEM vs JPEM
FDEM −0.19pt a year
0.25%0.44%
FDEM 5.0×the volume
87.5K17.4K
FDEM +3.0pt
+9.4%+6.4%
FDEM vs JPEM Performance
+56.9%+36.6%
- FDEM 0.25%, better
- JPEM 0.44%
- FDEM $591M
- JPEM $362M
- FDEM +12.6%, better
- JPEM +7.6%
- FDEM 3.48%
- JPEM 4.68%, better
- FDEM 229
- JPEM 562
- FDEM 87.5K sh, better
- JPEM 17.4K sh
- FDEM $33.73
- JPEM $61.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEM | JPEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | C53 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B57 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B65 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | C42 | B63Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A72Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEM and JPEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEMA
JPEMB
In short
FDEM Value, quality, momentum and low-volatility screens run across emerging markets stocks, plus an unusual extra filter: a tilt toward names less correlated with US equities. Fidelity's in-house index, priced under the category median.
JPEM A 2015-vintage multifactor read on emerging markets: JPMorgan spreads roughly 600 names across value, quality and momentum rather than letting the biggest companies set the weights.
Stated mandate
FDEM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index.
JPEM The fund is designed to provide emerging-markets equity exposure with potentially improved risk-adjusted returns versus a market-cap-weighted index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEM vs JPEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEM vs JPEM Cost
Overpaying JPEM vs FDEM
$3,693
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEM 0.25%
$5,159
JPEM 0.44%
$8,852
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEM | JPEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $794 | $339 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $3,061 | $1,292 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $8,852 | $3,693 |
- 0.25%FDEM, cheaper
- 0.44%JPEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
FDEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
JPEM 10th cheapest of 20 funds
FDEM vs JPEM Dividends
- FDEM 3.48%
- JPEM 4.68%, better
- FDEM $1.17
- JPEM $2.88
- FDEM $0.38
- JPEM $0.80
- FDEM Sep 18, 2026
- JPEM Sep 22, 2026
- FDEM Sep 22, 2026
- JPEM Sep 24, 2026
- FDEM Quarterly
- JPEM Quarterly
Distribution history
FDEM vs JPEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEM
- JPEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEM 13.8%JPEM 10.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEM 1.08, betterJPEM 0.88
- Worst fall
- FDEM −24.2%JPEM −21.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FDEM 0.98JPEM 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.