Skip to content

FDEV vs FDT

Fidelity International Multifactor ETF

FDEVACboe

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund

FDTDNasdaq

Overlap

13.8%by weight

Expense ratio

FDEV −0.62pt a year

FDEV0.18%FDT0.80%

Avg volume · 30D

FDT 4.2×the volume

FDEV29.3KFDT122K

5Y return · a year

FDT +3.5pt

FDEV+7.8%FDT+11.3%

FDEV vs FDT Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+45.8%FDEV+70.4%FDT

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FDEV +45.8%. FDT +70.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%25%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FDEV 0.18%, better
FDT 0.80%
Fund size
FDEV $276M
FDT $1.35B
1Y total return
FDEV +16.6%
FDT +18.5%, better
Yield (12M)
FDEV 3.27%, better
FDT 3.10%
Holdings
FDEV 210
FDT 313
Avg volume (30D)
FDEV 29.3K sh
FDT 122K sh, better
NAV per share
FDEV $37.31
FDT $88.49
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FDEV: Cost 91, Risk 78, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 48, Durability 42. FDT: Cost 5, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 75, Holdings 79, Durability 71.
Pillar letters and Scores for FDEV, FDT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFDEVFDT
Cost30% weightA91HigherF5
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA78HigherD29
Tradability15% weightB59A75Higher
Holdings10% weightC48A79Higher
Durability5% weightC42A71Higher

Rank among International Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FDEV and FDT are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

International Multifactor⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

FDEV ranks 4th and FDT 21st of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AINTFiShares International Equity Factor ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2ADFAIDimensional International Core Equity Market ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3AGSWOGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 4AFDEVFidelity International Multifactor ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 5ARODMHartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETFScore 71
  6. Rank 20CJHMDJohn Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETFScore 45
  7. Rank 21DFDTFirst Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX FundScore 38
  8. Rank 21DRWINRayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FDEVAFidelity International Multifactor ETF

FDTDFirst Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund

In short

FDEV Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one developed-markets index fund at 0.18% a year. Fidelity's answer to paying up for a single-factor tilt overseas.

FDT A 2011-vintage quant screen pointed at developed markets outside the US: rank stocks on growth and value signals, hold roughly 300 of them, ignore market cap. That conviction costs more than most multifactor rivals.

Stated mandate

FDEV The fund seeks returns generally corresponding to the Fidelity International Multifactor Index before fees and expenses.

FDT The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® Developed Markets Ex-USTM Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • FDEV 0.18% a year, less than half the typical fee in its international multifactor group, and within a rounding error of the cheapest name there (INTF at 0.16%).
  • One index does the work of four screens: value, quality, momentum and low volatility applied together, instead of you stacking separate single-factor funds.
  • Roughly 220 developed-market stocks outside the US, picked by published index rules rather than a manager's hunches, with cash paid out quarterly.
  • Sits in the top quartile of a 29-fund international factor cohort, which is a crowded field full of far pricier attempts at the same job.
  • FDT Not a cap-weighted index in a costume. The AlphaDEX screen ranks developed ex-US stocks on growth and value measures, then holds roughly 300 of the survivors.ftportfolios.com
  • Running since 2011, so this is a long live record for the strategy overseas, not a backtest with a ticker attached.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund with moderate trading activity, and it distributes on a quarterly schedule.

Worth knowing

  • FDEV Thinly traded. Spreads can quietly cost more than the fee, so limit orders matter more here than with the category's household names.
  • A 2019 launch still in the mid-size asset range, so there is no decades-long record to lean on the way older international index funds offer.
  • Blending four factors means none of them drives the bus. When value or momentum alone runs hot, this owns only a slice of that move.
  • FDT At 0.80% a year, it charges more than double the 0.38% median for international multifactor funds. INTF (0.16%) and FDEV (0.18%) run similar ideas for far less.
  • That fee is the main reason it lands in the lower half of its international multifactor peer group, despite sound plumbing and a deep asset base.
  • A growth-and-value screen builds a portfolio that can look nothing like a standard developed-markets index, so its path will diverge from EAFE-style funds.ftportfolios.com

Full FDEV profile⁠

Full FDT profile⁠

FDEV vs FDT Holdings

How FDEV and FDT differ

Overlap by weight

13.8%

Shared holdings make up 24.2% of FDEV and 17.3% of FDT.

Level by level

  • Holdings47 in both13.8%
  • Sector11 Sectors59.3%
  • Countryby domicile62.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FDEV and FDT, widest gap first
SectorMore in FDEVMore in FDT
IndustrialsFDT +18.5 points
FinancialsFDEV +12.9 points
Health CareFDEV +11.9 points
Consumer DiscretionaryFDT +7.4 points
CommunicationFDEV +5.8 points
Consumer StaplesFDEV +5.7 points
MaterialsFDT +5.4 points
UtilitiesFDT +5.0 points
TechnologyFDT +4.5 points
EnergyFDEV +2.5 points
Real EstateFDEV +1.8 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FDEV and FDT, widest gap first
CountryMore in FDEVMore in FDT
JapanFDT +12.8 points
South KoreaFDT +8.8 points
CanadaFDEV +8.7 points
United KingdomFDEV +8.4 points
ChinaFDT +7.7 points
FranceFDEV +5.7 points
SwitzerlandFDEV +4.1 points
NetherlandsFDEV +3.2 points
Other countries (19)FDT +0.9 points

Outside the US: FDEV 97% developed, 3% emerging. FDT 80% developed, 20% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FDEV15.6%
  • FDT6.2%

Securities held

  • FDEV198
  • FDT301

Asset class

FDEV
Equity
FDT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FDEV151
  • In both47
  • Only in FDT254

Only in FDEV

151 securities, 75.3% of FDEV by weight

  • Roche Holding AG1.75%
  • Daito Trust Construction1.69%
  • Hongkong Land Hldgs Ltd1.63%

Only in FDT

254 securities, 82.6% of FDT by weight

  • Sofina S.A.0.65%
  • Orient Overseas (International) Limited0.65%
  • Power Assets Holdings Limited0.63%

Weight gaps

All 47 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FDEV and FDT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FDEVMore in FDT
Shell PLCSHEL.LFDEV +1.43 points
Klepierre SAFDEV +1.20 points
Totalenergies SEFDEV +1.12 points
Suncor Energy IncFDEV +1.01 points
Cenovus Energy IncFDEV +0.89 points
Whitecap Resources IncFDEV +0.57 points
Vodafone Group PLCVOD.LFDEV +0.56 points
Inpex CorpFDEV +0.51 points

All 218 FDEV holdings⁠All 301 FDT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FDEV vs FDT Cost

Overpaying FDT vs FDEV

$11,597

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FDEV 0.18%

    $3,749

  • FDT 0.80%

    $15,346

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FDEV 0.18%
  • FDT 0.80%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FDT $15,346FDEV $3,749

Year by year

YearFDEVFDTOverpaying
10$328$1,422$1,094
20$1,281$5,393$4,112
30$3,749$15,346$11,597

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%FDEV, cheaper
  • 0.80%FDT
  • Middle half of International Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.34%

FDEV 3rd cheapest of 30 funds

FDT 27th cheapest of 30 funds

FDEV vs FDT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FDEV 3.27%, better
FDT 3.10%
Payout (12M)
FDEV $1.22
FDT $2.75
Last payment
FDEV $0.33
FDT $0.53
Ex-dividend
FDEV Sep 18, 2026
FDT Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
FDEV Sep 22, 2026
FDT Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
FDEV Quarterly
FDT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FDEVQuarterly · 31 paymentsAll FDEV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 31 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 15, 2019 $0.13; Jun 21, 2019 $0.27; Sep 20, 2019 $0.14; Dec 20, 2019 $0.19; Mar 20, 2020 $0.15; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.16; Dec 18, 2020 $0.04; Mar 19, 2021 $0.16; Jun 18, 2021 $0.23; Sep 17, 2021 $0.16; Dec 17, 2021 $0.29; Mar 18, 2022 $0.20; Jun 17, 2022 $0.20; Sep 16, 2022 $0.19; Dec 16, 2022 $0.06; Mar 17, 2023 $0.21; Jun 16, 2023 $0.23; Sep 15, 2023 $0.18; Dec 15, 2023 $0.12; Mar 15, 2024 $0.22; Jun 21, 2024 $0.27; Sep 20, 2024 $0.20; Dec 20, 2024 $0.14; Mar 21, 2025 $0.23; Jun 20, 2025 $0.29; Sep 19, 2025 $0.21; Dec 19, 2025 $0.26; Mar 20, 2026 $0.25; Jun 18, 2026 $0.38; Sep 18, 2026 $0.33. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
FDTQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FDT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2017 $0.08; Jun 22, 2017 $0.26; Sep 21, 2017 $0.09; Dec 21, 2017 $0.55; Mar 22, 2018 $0.06; Jun 21, 2018 $0.50; Sep 14, 2018 $0.24; Dec 18, 2018 $0.25; Mar 21, 2019 $0.11; Jun 14, 2019 $0.51; Sep 25, 2019 $0.29; Dec 13, 2019 $0.63; Mar 26, 2020 $0.05; Jun 25, 2020 $0.36; Sep 24, 2020 $0.06; Dec 24, 2020 $0.90; Mar 25, 2021 $0.23; Jun 24, 2021 $0.61; Sep 23, 2021 $0.36; Dec 23, 2021 $1.11; Mar 25, 2022 $0.08; Jun 24, 2022 $0.66; Sep 23, 2022 $0.16; Dec 23, 2022 $0.19; Mar 24, 2023 $0.20; Jun 27, 2023 $0.88; Sep 22, 2023 $0.28; Dec 22, 2023 $0.93; Mar 21, 2024 $0.20; Jun 27, 2024 $0.87; Sep 26, 2024 $0.25; Dec 13, 2024 $0.79; Mar 27, 2025 $0.11; Jun 26, 2025 $0.98; Sep 25, 2025 $0.41; Dec 12, 2025 $1.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.33; Jun 25, 2026 $0.78; Sep 24, 2026 $0.53. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

FDEV vs FDT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FDEV
  • FDT
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FDT −31.6% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FDEV 10.5%, betterFDT 16.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FDEV 1.31, betterFDT 1.27
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FDEV −27.9%, betterFDT −31.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FDEV 0.65FDT 1.10

Popular comparisons

  • FDEVAvsINTFA

    Fidelity International Multifactor ETF · iShares International Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.16%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDTDvsINTFA

    First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund · iShares International Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.16%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDEVAvsDFAIA

    Fidelity International Multifactor ETF · Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDTDvsDFAIA

    First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund · Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDEVAvsGSWOA

    Fidelity International Multifactor ETF · Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDTDvsGSWOA

    First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund · Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.