GSWO ranks 3rd and FDT 21st of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
FDT vs GSWO
GSWO −0.65pt a year
0.80%0.15%
FDT 1.9×the volume
122K64K
FDT vs GSWO Performance
−0.7%+0.5%
- FDT 0.80%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- FDT $1.35B
- GSWO $1.79B
- FDT +18.5%
- GSWO
- FDT 3.10%, better
- GSWO 1.46%
- FDT 313
- GSWO 751
- FDT 122K sh, better
- GSWO 64K sh
- FDT $88.49
- GSWO $64.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDT | GSWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A98Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D29 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A75 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | A79Higher | F22 |
| Durability | A71Higher | B62 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDT and GSWO are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDTD
GSWOA
In short
FDT A 2011-vintage quant screen pointed at developed markets outside the US: rank stocks on growth and value signals, hold roughly 300 of them, ignore market cap. That conviction costs more than most multifactor rivals.
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
Stated mandate
FDT The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® Developed Markets Ex-USTM Index before fees and expenses.
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDT vs GSWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDT vs GSWO Cost
Overpaying FDT vs GSWO
$12,209
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDT 0.80%
$15,346
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDT | GSWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $274 | $1,148 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $1,071 | $4,322 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $3,137 | $12,209 |
- 0.80%FDT
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
FDT 27th cheapest of 30 funds
FDT vs GSWO Dividends
- FDT 3.10%, better
- GSWO 1.46%
- FDT $2.75
- GSWO $0.93
- FDT $0.53
- GSWO $0.20
- FDT Sep 24, 2026
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- FDT Sep 30, 2026
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- FDT Quarterly
- GSWO Quarterly
Distribution history
FDT vs GSWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDT 16.7%GSWO
- Return per unit of risk
- FDT 1.27GSWO
- Worst fall
- FDT −31.6%GSWO
- Market sensitivity
- FDT 1.10GSWO 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.