FDEV ranks 4th and QINT 14th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
FDEV vs QINT
FDEV −0.16pt a year
0.18%0.34%
QINT 1.9×the volume
29.3K55K
QINT +1.4pt
+7.8%+9.2%
FDEV vs QINT Performance
+45.3%+55.0%
- FDEV 0.18%, better
- QINT 0.34%
- FDEV $276M
- QINT $781M
- FDEV +17.2%, better
- QINT +14.9%
- FDEV 3.26%, better
- QINT 2.82%
- FDEV 210
- QINT 376
- FDEV 29.3K sh
- QINT 55K sh, better
- FDEV $37.31
- QINT $68.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEV | QINT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A78Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B58 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | B66Higher |
| Durability | C42Higher | C41 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEV and QINT are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEVA
QINTC
In short
FDEV Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one developed-markets index fund at 0.18% a year. Fidelity's answer to paying up for a single-factor tilt overseas.
QINT American Century wrote its own index for this one: roughly 400 non-US stocks screened for quality, then tilted toward growth or value as conditions shift. A factor fund built to move with the weather rather than hold one fixed blend.
Stated mandate
FDEV The fund seeks returns generally corresponding to the Fidelity International Multifactor Index before fees and expenses.
QINT The fund tracks the American Century Quality Diversified International Equity Index. Its index methodology seeks international core exposure by excluding lower-quality stocks and selecting companies with attractive quality, growth and value characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEV vs QINT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEV vs QINT Cost
Overpaying QINT vs FDEV
$3,183
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEV 0.18%
$3,749
QINT 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEV | QINT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $616 | $288 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,386 | $1,105 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $6,932 | $3,183 |
- 0.18%FDEV, cheaper
- 0.34%QINT
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
FDEV 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
QINT 15th cheapest of 30 funds
FDEV vs QINT Dividends
- FDEV 3.26%, better
- QINT 2.82%
- FDEV $1.22
- QINT $1.94
- FDEV $0.33
- QINT $0.22
- FDEV Sep 18, 2026
- QINT Sep 8, 2026
- FDEV Sep 22, 2026
- QINT Sep 10, 2026
- FDEV Quarterly
- QINT Quarterly
Distribution history
FDEV vs QINT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEV
- QINT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEV 10.5%, betterQINT 11.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEV 1.31QINT 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- FDEV −27.9%, betterQINT −32.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FDEV 0.65QINT 0.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.