GSWO ranks 3rd and QINT 14th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
GSWO vs QINT
GSWO −0.19pt a year
0.15%0.34%
GSWO 1.2×the volume
64K55K
GSWO vs QINT Performance
+0.5%−2.9%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- QINT 0.34%
- GSWO $1.79B
- QINT $781M
- GSWO
- QINT +14.2%
- GSWO 1.46%
- QINT 2.83%, better
- GSWO 751
- QINT 374
- GSWO 64K sh, better
- QINT 55K sh
- GSWO $64.95
- QINT $68.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSWO | QINT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | F22 | B66Higher |
| Durability | B62Higher | C41 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. GSWO and QINT are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSWOA
QINTC
In short
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
QINT American Century wrote its own index for this one: roughly 400 non-US stocks screened for quality, then tilted toward growth or value as conditions shift. A factor fund built to move with the weather rather than hold one fixed blend.
Stated mandate
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
QINT The fund tracks the American Century Quality Diversified International Equity Index. Its index methodology seeks international core exposure by excluding lower-quality stocks and selecting companies with attractive quality, growth and value characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSWO vs QINT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSWO vs QINT Cost
Overpaying QINT vs GSWO
$3,795
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
QINT 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSWO | QINT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $616 | $342 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,386 | $1,315 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $6,932 | $3,795 |
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- 0.34%QINT
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
QINT 15th cheapest of 30 funds
GSWO vs QINT Dividends
- GSWO 1.46%
- QINT 2.83%, better
- GSWO $0.93
- QINT $1.94
- GSWO $0.20
- QINT $0.22
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- QINT Sep 8, 2026
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- QINT Sep 10, 2026
- GSWO Quarterly
- QINT Quarterly
Distribution history
GSWO vs QINT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSWO QINT 11.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSWO QINT 1.38
- Worst fall
- GSWO QINT −32.3%
- Market sensitivity
- GSWO 0.75QINT 0.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.