INTF ranks 1st and QINT 14th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
INTF vs QINT
INTF −0.18pt a year
0.16%0.34%
INTF 5.6×the volume
309K55K
INTF +1.3pt
+10.5%+9.2%
INTF vs QINT Performance
+64.8%+55.0%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- QINT 0.34%
- INTF $3.7B
- QINT $781M
- INTF +17.2%, better
- QINT +14.9%
- INTF 3.01%, better
- QINT 2.82%
- INTF 501
- QINT 376
- INTF 309K sh, better
- QINT 55K sh
- INTF $41.10
- QINT $68.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INTF | QINT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B55Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A86Higher | C41 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. INTF and QINT are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INTFA
QINTC
In short
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
QINT American Century wrote its own index for this one: roughly 400 non-US stocks screened for quality, then tilted toward growth or value as conditions shift. A factor fund built to move with the weather rather than hold one fixed blend.
Stated mandate
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
QINT The fund tracks the American Century Quality Diversified International Equity Index. Its index methodology seeks international core exposure by excluding lower-quality stocks and selecting companies with attractive quality, growth and value characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INTF vs QINT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INTF vs QINT Cost
Overpaying QINT vs INTF
$3,590
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
QINT 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INTF | QINT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $616 | $324 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $2,386 | $1,245 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $6,932 | $3,590 |
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- 0.34%QINT
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
QINT 15th cheapest of 30 funds
INTF vs QINT Dividends
- INTF 3.01%, better
- QINT 2.82%
- INTF $1.24
- QINT $1.94
- INTF $0.72
- QINT $0.22
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- QINT Sep 8, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- QINT Sep 10, 2026
- INTF Twice a year
- QINT Quarterly
Distribution history
INTF vs QINT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INTF
- QINT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INTF 11.2%, betterQINT 11.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- INTF 1.45, betterQINT 1.38
- Worst fall
- INTF −27.6%, betterQINT −32.3%
- Market sensitivity
- INTF 0.74QINT 0.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.