FDEV ranks 4th and RODM 5th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
FDEV vs RODM
FDEV −0.11pt a year
0.18%0.29%
RODM 3.0×the volume
29.3K88.7K
RODM +2.9pt
+7.8%+10.7%
FDEV vs RODM Performance
+45.8%+66.5%
- FDEV 0.18%, better
- RODM 0.29%
- FDEV $276M
- RODM $1.68B
- FDEV +16.6%
- RODM +21.6%, better
- FDEV 3.27%, better
- RODM 2.76%
- FDEV 210
- RODM 338
- FDEV 29.3K sh
- RODM 88.7K sh, better
- FDEV $37.31
- RODM $42.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEV | RODM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | B67 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A78 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | A72Higher |
| Durability | C42 | A70Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEV and RODM are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEVA
RODMA
In short
FDEV Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one developed-markets index fund at 0.18% a year. Fidelity's answer to paying up for a single-factor tilt overseas.
RODM Most international factor funds pick cheap, quality and momentum stocks and let the country weights land where they may. RODM's index does the factor work inside risk limits built to de-concentrate country, currency and single-company exposure.
Stated mandate
FDEV The fund seeks returns generally corresponding to the Fidelity International Multifactor Index before fees and expenses.
RODM Seeks, before fees and expenses, to track the total return of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, which covers companies in major developed markets outside the United States.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEV vs RODM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEV vs RODM Cost
Overpaying RODM vs FDEV
$2,203
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEV 0.18%
$3,749
RODM 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEV | RODM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $527 | $199 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,044 | $763 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $5,952 | $2,203 |
- 0.18%FDEV, cheaper
- 0.29%RODM
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
FDEV 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
RODM 11th cheapest of 30 funds
FDEV vs RODM Dividends
- FDEV 3.27%, better
- RODM 2.76%
- FDEV $1.22
- RODM $1.16
- FDEV $0.33
- RODM $0.64
- FDEV Sep 18, 2026
- RODM Jun 25, 2026
- FDEV Sep 22, 2026
- RODM Jun 29, 2026
- FDEV Quarterly
- RODM Twice a year
Distribution history
FDEV vs RODM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEV
- RODM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEV 10.5%RODM 10.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEV 1.31RODM 1.71, better
- Worst fall
- FDEV −27.9%RODM −27.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FDEV 0.65RODM 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.