INTF ranks 1st and RODM 5th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
INTF vs RODM
INTF −0.13pt a year
0.16%0.29%
INTF 3.5×the volume
309K88.7K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+9.3%+9.3%
INTF vs RODM Performance
+65.8%+66.5%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- RODM 0.29%
- INTF $3.7B
- RODM $1.68B
- INTF +17.0%
- RODM +21.6%, better
- INTF 3.02%, better
- RODM 2.76%
- INTF 501
- RODM 338
- INTF 309K sh, better
- RODM 88.7K sh
- INTF $41.10
- RODM $42.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INTF | RODM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | B67 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | B68 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A86Higher | A70 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. INTF and RODM are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INTFA
RODMA
In short
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
RODM Most international factor funds pick cheap, quality and momentum stocks and let the country weights land where they may. RODM's index does the factor work inside risk limits built to de-concentrate country, currency and single-company exposure.
Stated mandate
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
RODM Seeks, before fees and expenses, to track the total return of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, which covers companies in major developed markets outside the United States.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INTF vs RODM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INTF vs RODM Cost
Overpaying RODM vs INTF
$2,610
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
RODM 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INTF | RODM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $527 | $235 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $2,044 | $903 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $5,952 | $2,610 |
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- 0.29%RODM
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
RODM 11th cheapest of 30 funds
INTF vs RODM Dividends
- INTF 3.02%, better
- RODM 2.76%
- INTF $1.24
- RODM $1.16
- INTF $0.72
- RODM $0.64
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- RODM Jun 25, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- RODM Jun 29, 2026
- INTF Twice a year
- RODM Twice a year
Distribution history
INTF vs RODM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INTF
- RODM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INTF 11.2%RODM 10.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- INTF 1.45RODM 1.71, better
- Worst fall
- INTF −27.6%RODM −27.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- INTF 0.74RODM 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.