SCYB ranks 1st and FDHY 29th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
FDHY vs SCYB
SCYB −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SCYB 11.8×the volume
93.6K1.1M
FDHY +0.5pt
+8.9%+8.4%
FDHY vs SCYB Performance
+3.8%+2.0%
- FDHY 0.35%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- FDHY $613M
- SCYB $2.8B
- FDHY +3.8%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- FDHY 6.68%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- FDHY 283
- SCYB 1844
- FDHY 93.6K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- FDHY $47.59
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDHY | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B58 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | B57 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | A99Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. FDHY and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDHYB
SCYBA
In short
FDHY Most high yield ETFs just buy the index. FDHY is Fidelity's active, quant-driven version: value and quality screens run against a BB-B benchmark, priced below the typical fund in the category.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
FDHY The fund seeks a high level of income and may also pursue capital appreciation. It uses a quantitative, rules-based approach intended to exploit market inefficiencies.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDHY vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDHY vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying FDHY vs SCYB
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDHY 0.35%
$7,126
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDHY | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%FDHY
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
FDHY 24th cheapest of 84 funds
FDHY vs SCYB Dividends
- FDHY 6.68%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- FDHY $3.19
- SCYB $1.80
- FDHY $0.27
- SCYB $0.16
- FDHY Oct 29, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- FDHY Pays Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- FDHY Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
FDHY vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDHY 4.5%, betterSCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDHY 0.96, betterSCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- FDHY −16.4%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FDHY 0.63SCYB 0.28
FDHY and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
