FDIF ranks 3rd and HUMN 14th of 18 funds in the Robotics & Automation Category.
FDIF vs HUMN
FDIF −0.25pt a year
0.50%0.75%
HUMN 9.9×the volume
9.67K96.2K
FDIF vs HUMN Performance
+9.2%−13.7%
- FDIF 0.50%, better
- HUMN 0.75%
- FDIF $110M
- HUMN $85M
- FDIF +9.2%, better
- HUMN −13.7%
- FDIF 0.26%
- HUMN
- FDIF 7
- HUMN 45
- FDIF 9.67K sh
- HUMN 96.2K sh, better
- FDIF $39.62
- HUMN $27.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDIF | HUMN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A88Higher | D37 |
| Risk | A89Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | C54Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | F21 | B65Higher |
| Durability | A78Higher | B63 |
Rank among Robotics & Automation funds
Same Category. FDIF and HUMN are both graded against the same 18 Robotics & Automation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDIFB
HUMND
In short
FDIF Fidelity's disruption bet, aimed at companies remaking work through automation. It charges 0.50% where the typical robotics-theme fund asks 0.65%, and it has been running since 2020. The trade-off: it trades quietly.
HUMN The first US-listed ETF built purely around humanoid robots, live since 2025. Roundhill picks roughly 40 names actively, judging which companies are genuinely closest to building the machines rather than tracking an index.
Stated mandate
FDIF The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in companies involved in disruptive automation.
HUMN The actively managed ETF invests in equity securities of companies involved in humanoid robotics, including robots designed with human-like structures and functions and equipped with advanced sensors, artificial intelligence, and actuators.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDIF vs HUMN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDIF vs HUMN Cost
Overpaying HUMN vs FDIF
$4,503
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDIF 0.50%
$9,979
HUMN 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDIF | HUMN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,336 | $436 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,078 | $1,618 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $14,482 | $4,503 |
- 0.50%FDIF, cheaper
- 0.75%HUMN
- Middle half of Robotics & Automation funds
- Median 0.54%
FDIF 7th cheapest of 18 funds
HUMN 14th cheapest of 18 funds
FDIF vs HUMN Dividends
- FDIF 0.26%
- HUMN
- FDIF $0.10
- HUMN
- FDIF $0.02
- HUMN $0.22
- FDIF Sep 18, 2026
- HUMN Dec 30, 2025
- FDIF Sep 22, 2026
- HUMN Dec 31, 2025
- FDIF Quarterly
- HUMN Irregular
Distribution history
FDIF vs HUMN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDIF 16.7%HUMN 34.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDIF 1.04HUMN 0.21
- Worst fall
- FDIF −22.6%HUMN −34.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FDIF 1.25HUMN 2.40
FDIF and HUMN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


