VB ranks 2nd and FDM 12th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
FDM vs VB
VB −0.57pt a year
0.60%0.03%
VB 53.1×the volume
9.39K499K
FDM +0.5pt
+11.6%+11.1%
FDM vs VB Performance
+58.7%+36.2%
- FDM 0.60%
- VB 0.03%, better
- FDM $268M
- VB $176B
- FDM +25.1%, better
- VB +15.3%
- FDM 1.51%, better
- VB 1.26%
- FDM 136
- VB 1305
- FDM 9.39K sh
- VB 499K sh, better
- FDM $90.64
- VB $290.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDM | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A86Higher |
| Risk | A70Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | B58Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | F23 | B59Higher |
| Durability | C42 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FDM and VB are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDMC
VBA
In short
FDM Micro-cap, but screened. FDM's index starts with the US total market and keeps only the tiny companies that clear size, liquidity and fundamental tests. Running since 2005, at 0.60% net of a waiver through April 30, 2027.
VB Vanguard's small-cap workhorse: roughly 1,400 smaller US companies for three basis points. The CRSP index behind it shifts stocks between size bands in two half steps instead of one jump, which holds turnover down. Trading since 2004.
Stated mandate
FDM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Dow Jones Select Microcap Index.
VB The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Index, which measures the investment performance of small U.S. companies. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the index by holding its securities in approximately their index weights.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDM vs VB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDM vs VB Cost
Overpaying FDM vs VB
$11,179
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDM 0.60%
$11,817
VB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDM | VB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $55 | $1,021 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $216 | $3,900 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $638 | $11,179 |
- 0.60%FDM
- 0.03%VB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VB cheapest of 16 funds
FDM 14th cheapest of 16 funds
FDM vs VB Dividends
- FDM 1.51%, better
- VB 1.26%
- FDM $1.37
- VB $3.65
- FDM $0.38
- VB $0.85
- FDM Sep 24, 2026
- VB Sep 28, 2026
- FDM Sep 30, 2026
- VB Sep 30, 2026
- FDM Quarterly
- VB Quarterly
Distribution history
FDM vs VB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDM
- VB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDM 18.7%VB 16.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDM 0.93, betterVB 0.89
- Worst fall
- FDM −23.7%, betterVB −28.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FDM 0.98VB 1.07
FDM and VB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



