Skip to content

FDND vs GPIQ

FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF

FDNDDCboe

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF

GPIQANasdaq

Overlap

16.7%by weight

Expense ratio

GPIQ −0.46pt a year

FDND0.75%GPIQ0.29%

Avg volume · 30D

GPIQ 1015.8×the volume

FDND1.55KGPIQ1.57M

FDND vs GPIQ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−7.0%FDND+11.4%GPIQ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FDND −7.0%. GPIQ +11.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FDND 0.75%
GPIQ 0.29%, better
Fund size
FDND $9M
GPIQ $6.52B
1Y total return
FDND −7.0%
GPIQ +11.4%, better
Yield (12M)
FDND 8.31%
GPIQ 10.62%, better
Holdings
FDND 42
GPIQ 102
Avg volume (30D)
FDND 1.55K sh
GPIQ 1.57M sh, better
NAV per share
FDND $20.63
GPIQ $56.04
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FDND: Cost 42, Risk 7, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 40, Durability 42. GPIQ: Cost 92, Risk 52, Mission 100, Tradability 73, Holdings 85, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for FDND, GPIQ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFDNDGPIQ
Cost30% weightC42A92Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA100
Risk15% weightF7C52Higher
Tradability15% weightD39A73Higher
Holdings10% weightC40A85Higher
Durability5% weightC42A79Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FDND and GPIQ are both graded against the same 30 Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Option Income⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

GPIQ ranks 1st and FDND 27th of 30 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AGPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2AQQAInvesco QQQ Income Advantage ETFScore 82
  3. Rank 25DQLDYDefiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETFScore 34
  4. Rank 27DFDNDFT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETFScore 33
  5. Rank 27DQDTYYieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETFScore 33

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FDNDDFT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF

GPIQAGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF

In short

FDND No data

GPIQ Goldman's take on the Nasdaq-100 income trade: it owns the index but sells calls on only 25% to 75% of the portfolio, reset monthly, so part of the upside stays uncapped. Fee is 0.29% net of a waiver through April 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

FDND No data

GPIQ The Fund seeks current income while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation. It provides Nasdaq-100 equity exposure and dynamically sells call options while seeking participation in rising markets.

Why people hold it

FDND No data

  • GPIQ The overwrite is a dial, not a switch: calls cover 25% to 75% of the equity portfolio, reset each month, leaving a slice of Nasdaq-100 upside uncapped by design.gsam.com
  • 0.29% net of a waiver through April 30, 2027 undercuts JEPQ at 0.35% and QYLD at 0.60%, and matches QQA, which is 0.29% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027.
  • Calls are written on index-level exposure, not individual names, and the stock sleeve tracks Nasdaq-100 weights. Pays monthly.sec.gov
  • A multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund and one of the strongest implementations in a crowded Nasdaq-100 income group.

Worth knowing

FDND No data

  • GPIQ Goldman's filing flags that a significant portion of distributions may be return of capital, which trims your cost basis rather than adding to it.sec.gov
  • Full exposure to Nasdaq-100 drawdowns stays; premium cushions the ride but does not offset a selloff, and gains on the overwritten slice are capped.sec.gov
  • Gross fee is 0.35%. If the waiver is not extended past April 30, 2027, the cost steps up to that level.

Full FDND profile⁠

Full GPIQ profile⁠

FDND vs GPIQ Holdings

How FDND and GPIQ differ

Overlap by weight

16.7%

Shared holdings make up 60.9% of FDND and 16.7% of GPIQ.

Level by level

  • Holdings14 in both16.7%
  • Countryby domicile97.4%

Sector

No Sector split for FDND.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FDND and GPIQ, widest gap first
CountryMore in FDNDMore in GPIQ
United StatesFDND +1.4 points
AustraliaFDND +1.2 points
CanadaGPIQ +1.1 points
NetherlandsGPIQ +0.7 points
Other countries (3)GPIQ +0.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FDND60.7%
  • GPIQ46.4%

Securities held

  • FDND41
  • GPIQ101

Asset class

FDND
Multi-Asset
GPIQ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FDND27
  • In both14
  • Only in GPIQ87

Only in FDND

27 securities, 38.5% of FDND by weight

  • Salesforce, Inc.4.54%
  • Arista Networks, Inc.4.24%
  • Oracle Corporation3.91%

Only in GPIQ

87 securities, 83.6% of GPIQ by weight

  • Apple Inc.7.99%
  • NVIDIA Corporation7.82%
  • Microsoft Corporation6.25%

Weight gaps

All 14 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FDND and GPIQ, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FDNDMore in GPIQ
Cisco Systems, Inc.CSCOFDND +7.27 points
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A)METAFDND +7.05 points
Amazon.com, Inc.AMZNFDND +6.19 points
Netflix, Inc.NFLXFDND +4.66 points
Booking Holdings Inc.BKNGFDND +3.70 points
Datadog, Inc. (Class A)DDOGFDND +2.47 points
Alphabet Inc. (Class C)GOOGFDND +2.47 points
DoorDash, Inc. (Class A)DASHFDND +2.19 points

All 42 FDND holdings⁠All 106 GPIQ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FDND vs GPIQ Cost

Overpaying FDND vs GPIQ

$8,530

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FDND 0.75%

    $14,482

  • GPIQ 0.29%

    $5,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FDND 0.75%
  • GPIQ 0.29%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FDND $14,482GPIQ $5,952

Year by year

YearFDNDGPIQOverpaying
10$1,336$527$809
20$5,078$2,044$3,034
30$14,482$5,952$8,530

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%FDND
  • 0.29%GPIQ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
  • Median 0.71%

GPIQ 2nd cheapest of 30 funds

FDND 17th cheapest of 30 funds

FDND vs GPIQ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FDND 8.31%
GPIQ 10.62%, better
Payout (12M)
FDND $1.72
GPIQ $5.77
Last payment
FDND $0.14
GPIQ $0.51
Ex-dividend
FDND Oct 21, 2026
GPIQ Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
FDND Oct 30, 2026
GPIQ Oct 7, 2026
Frequency
FDND Monthly
GPIQ Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FDNDMonthly · 31 paymentsAll FDND payments⁠
One bar per payment. 31 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Apr 23, 2024 $0.13; May 21, 2024 $0.14; Jun 27, 2024 $0.13; Jul 23, 2024 $0.13; Aug 21, 2024 $0.13; Sep 26, 2024 $0.13; Oct 22, 2024 $0.14; Nov 21, 2024 $0.14; Dec 13, 2024 $0.15; Jan 22, 2025 $0.15; Feb 21, 2025 $0.16; Mar 27, 2025 $0.15; Apr 22, 2025 $0.13; May 21, 2025 $0.15; Jun 26, 2025 $0.15; Jul 22, 2025 $0.16; Aug 21, 2025 $0.16; Sep 25, 2025 $0.16; Oct 21, 2025 $0.16; Nov 21, 2025 $0.15; Dec 12, 2025 $0.15; Jan 21, 2026 $0.15; Feb 20, 2026 $0.13; Mar 26, 2026 $0.13; Apr 21, 2026 $0.14; May 21, 2026 $0.14; Jun 25, 2026 $0.14; Jul 21, 2026 $0.14; Aug 21, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.15; Oct 21, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
GPIQMonthly · 35 paymentsAll GPIQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 35 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 4, 2023 $0.38; Dec 28, 2023 $0.39; Feb 2, 2024 $0.39; Mar 4, 2024 $0.40; Apr 2, 2024 $0.41; May 2, 2024 $0.39; Jun 4, 2024 $0.41; Jul 2, 2024 $0.42; Aug 2, 2024 $0.41; Sep 4, 2024 $0.41; Oct 2, 2024 $0.42; Nov 4, 2024 $0.41; Dec 3, 2024 $0.43; Jan 3, 2025 $0.43; Feb 3, 2025 $0.44; Mar 3, 2025 $0.41; Apr 1, 2025 $0.39; May 1, 2025 $0.39; Jun 2, 2025 $0.41; Jul 1, 2025 $0.43; Aug 1, 2025 $0.44; Sep 2, 2025 $0.44; Oct 1, 2025 $0.46; Nov 3, 2025 $0.47; Dec 1, 2025 $0.47; Jan 2, 2026 $0.46; Feb 2, 2026 $0.47; Mar 2, 2026 $0.45; Apr 1, 2026 $0.43; May 1, 2026 $0.48; Jun 1, 2026 $0.52; Jul 1, 2026 $0.52; Aug 3, 2026 $0.49; Sep 1, 2026 $0.50; Oct 1, 2026 $0.51. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

FDND vs GPIQ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FDND 18.8%since Apr 2024GPIQ 14.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FDND 0.32since Apr 2024GPIQ 1.21
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FDND −24.1%since Mar 2024GPIQ −21.1%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FDND 1.14GPIQ 1.16

FDND and GPIQ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FDNDDvsQQAA

    FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF · Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GPIQAvsQQAA

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF · Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDNDDvsJEPQA

    FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF · JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GPIQAvsJEPQA

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF · JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDNDDvsQYLDA

    FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF · Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GPIQAvsQYLDA

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF · Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.