FDND vs QYLD: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF

FDNDDCboe

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF

QYLDANasdaq

Overlap

19.6%by weight

Expense ratio

QYLD −0.15pt a year

FDND0.75%QYLD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

QYLD 2779.9×the volume

FDND1.55KQYLD4.31M

FDND vs QYLD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−7.0%FDND+15.7%QYLD

Expense ratio: FDND 0.75%; QYLD 0.60%, better
Fund size: FDND $9M; QYLD $8.2B
1Y total return: FDND −7.0%; QYLD +15.7%, better
Yield (12M): FDND 8.31%; QYLD 11.96%, better
Holdings: FDND 42; QYLD 103
Avg volume (30D): FDND 1.55K sh; QYLD 4.31M sh, better
NAV per share: FDND $20.63; QYLD $17.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for FDND, QYLD, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	FDND	QYLD
Cost30% weight	C42	B65Higher
Mission25% weight	Not scored	A100
Risk15% weight	F7	A72Higher
Tradability15% weight	D39	A89Higher
Holdings10% weight	C40	B68Higher
Durability5% weight	C42	A90Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. FDND and QYLD are both graded against the same 30 Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Option Income⁠

Category · 30 funds

See all 30 ›

QYLD ranks 4th and FDND 27th of 30 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Option Income Category.

Rank 1AGPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETFScore 83
Rank 2AQQAInvesco QQQ Income Advantage ETFScore 82
Rank 3AJEPQJPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETFScore 80
Rank 4AQYLDGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETFScore 79
Rank 5AQYLGGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETFScore 77
Rank 25DQLDYDefiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETFScore 34
Rank 27DFDNDFT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETFScore 33
Rank 27DQDTYYieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETFScore 33

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FDNDDFT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF

QYLDAGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF

In short

FDND No data

QYLD Running since 2013, QYLD is the no-frills version of the Nasdaq-100 income trade: own the index, sell calls against it, pay out monthly. No stock picking, no manager discretion, just a rules-based buy-write index followed closely.

Stated mandate

FDND No data

QYLD QYLD seeks, before fees and expenses, to generally match the price and yield performance of the Cboe NASDAQ-100® BuyWrite V2 Index. It uses a buy-write strategy that holds NASDAQ-100 stocks and sells corresponding call options.

Why people hold it

FDND No data

QYLD Simple machine: holds Nasdaq-100 stocks, sells the matching calls, and tracks the Cboe NASDAQ-100 BuyWrite V2 Index closely. Nothing to second-guess.
Income arrives monthly, and the 0.60% fee sits under the median for Nasdaq-100 options-income funds.
A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades very actively, so getting in and out is rarely the hard part.

Worth knowing

FDND No data

QYLD Writing calls sells the upside. When the Nasdaq-100 runs past the strike, that gain goes to the option buyer, not the fund.
Leaner options on the same index: QQA at 0.33%, GPIQ and JEPQ at 0.35%.
Payouts are funded by option premium and no target rate is declared, so the monthly check varies with volatility.

Full FDND profile⁠

Full QYLD profile⁠

FDND vs QYLD Holdings

As of Oct 13, 2026

How FDND and QYLD differ

Overlap by weight

19.6%

Shared holdings make up 60.9% of FDND and 19.6% of QYLD.

Level by level

Holdings14 in both19.6%
Countryby domicile97.3%

Sector

No Sector split for FDND.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FDND and QYLD, widest gap first
Country	More in FDNDMore in QYLD	FDND	QYLD
United States	FDND +1.5 points	98.8%	97.3%
Australia	FDND +1.2 points	1.2%	0.0%
Canada	QYLD +1.1 points	0.0%	1.1%
Netherlands	QYLD +0.9 points	0.0%	0.9%
Other countries (3)	QYLD +0.8 points	0.0%	0.8%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

FDND60.7%
QYLD48.9%

Securities held

FDND41
QYLD102

Asset class

FDND: Multi-Asset
QYLD: Equity

Holdings

Only in FDND27
In both14
Only in QYLD88

Only in FDND

27 securities, 38.5% of FDND by weight

Salesforce, Inc.4.54%
Arista Networks, Inc.4.24%
Oracle Corporation3.91%
Snowflake Inc. (Class A)3.89%
Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A)3.31%
Carvana Co. (Class A)1.80%
eBay Inc.1.78%
Veeva Systems Inc. (Class A)1.71%
Ciena Corporation1.68%
Okta, Inc.1.27%
Atlassian Corporation (Class A)1.12%
Roblox Corporation (Class A)1.06%
Zoom Communications, Inc. (Class A)0.93%
VeriSign, Inc.0.92%
F5, Inc.0.70%
Nutanix, Inc. (Class A)0.67%
DocuSign, Inc.0.58%
Samsara Inc. (Class A)0.58%
GoDaddy Inc. (Class A)0.54%
Circle Internet Group, Inc. (Class A)0.54%
Reddit, Inc. (Class A)0.49%
Akamai Technologies, Inc.0.49%
HubSpot, Inc.0.43%
Flutter Entertainment Plc0.43%
DraftKings Inc.0.38%
Paycom Software, Inc.0.37%
Duolingo, Inc.0.19%

Only in QYLD

88 securities, 84.5% of QYLD by weight

NVIDIA Corp8.55%
Apple Inc7.80%
Microsoft Corp6.30%
Micron Technology Inc4.83%
Advanced Micro Devices4.20%
Tesla Inc3.11%
Space Exploration Techn-Cl A3.03%
Broadcom Inc2.65%
Walmart Inc2.38%
Intel Corp2.30%
Palantir Technologies Inc-A2.08%
Costco Wholesale Corp1.84%
Applied Materials Inc1.71%
Lam Research Corp1.68%
Palo Alto Networks Inc1.42%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A1.17%
Texas Instruments Inc1.12%
Kla Corp1.07%
Marvell Technology Inc1.01%
Amgen Inc0.98%
Linde PLC0.97%
Sandisk Corp0.94%
Shopify Inc - Class A0.94%
Analog Devices Inc0.85%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.81%
Qualcomm Inc0.79%
Pepsico Inc0.75%
Seagate Technology Holdings0.74%
T-Mobile Us Inc0.70%
Asml Holding Nv-Ny Reg Shs0.69%
Intuitive Surgical Inc0.65%
Fortinet Inc0.62%
Western Digital Corp0.60%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.56%
Automatic Data Processing0.47%
Arm Holdings Plc-Adr0.47%
Starbucks Corp0.46%
Constellation Energy0.45%
Mercadolibre Inc0.42%
Marriott International -Cl A0.42%
Synopsys Inc0.41%
Cadence Design Sys Inc0.41%
Adobe Inc0.41%
Csx Corp0.39%
Lumentum Holdings Inc0.38%
Monster Beverage Corp0.37%
Moderna Inc0.37%
Intuit Inc0.36%
Cintas Corp0.36%
Applovin Corp-Class A0.36%

Weight gaps

All 14 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FDND and QYLD, widest gap first
Holding	More in FDNDMore in QYLD	FDND	QYLD
Cisco Systems, Inc.CSCO	FDND +6.97 points	8.94%	1.97%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A)META	FDND +6.66 points	10.12%	3.46%
Amazon.com, Inc.AMZN	FDND +5.85 points	10.24%	4.39%
Netflix, Inc.NFLX	FDND +4.26 points	5.53%	1.27%
Booking Holdings Inc.BKNG	FDND +3.58 points	4.09%	0.51%
Datadog, Inc. (Class A)DDOG	FDND +2.49 points	2.90%	0.41%
Airbnb, Inc. (Class A)ABNB	FDND +2.23 points	2.53%	0.30%
DoorDash, Inc. (Class A)DASH	FDND +2.12 points	2.47%	0.35%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A)GOOGL	FDND +1.79 points	5.04%	3.25%
PayPal Holdings, Inc.PYPL	FDND +1.57 points	1.78%	0.21%
Workday, Inc. (Class A)WDAY	FDND +1.30 points	1.46%	0.16%
Alphabet Inc. (Class C)GOOG	FDND +1.04 points	4.06%	3.02%
Copart, Inc.CPRT	FDND +0.82 points	0.93%	0.11%
CoreWeave, Inc. (Class A)CRWV	FDND +0.61 points	0.77%	0.16%

All 42 FDND holdings⁠All 102 QYLD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FDND vs QYLD Cost

Overpaying FDND vs QYLD

$2,665

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

FDND 0.75%
$14,482
QYLD 0.60%
$11,817

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

FDND 0.75%
QYLD 0.60%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	FDND	QYLD	Overpaying
10	$1,336	$1,076	$260
20	$5,078	$4,116	$962
30	$14,482	$11,817	$2,665

Expense ratio

0.75%FDND
0.60%QYLD, cheaper

QYLD0.60%FDND0.75%

0.00%1.20%

Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
Median 0.71%

QYLD 10th cheapest of 30 funds

FDND 17th cheapest of 30 funds

FDND vs QYLD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): FDND 8.31%; QYLD 11.96%, better
Payout (12M): FDND $1.72; QYLD $2.14
Last payment: FDND $0.14; QYLD $0.18
Ex-dividend: FDND Oct 21, 2026; QYLD Oct 19, 2026
Paid on: FDND Oct 30, 2026; QYLD Oct 22, 2026
Frequency: FDND Monthly; QYLD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FDNDMonthly · 31 paymentsAll FDND payments⁠

QYLDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll QYLD payments⁠

FDND vs QYLD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: FDND 18.8%since Apr 2024QYLD 8.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: FDND 0.32since Apr 2024QYLD 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: FDND −24.1%since Mar 2024QYLD −24.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: FDND 1.14QYLD 0.48; Market = 1

FDND and QYLD in the news

All news⁠

Category Review
The four largest Nasdaq-100 income funds trailed the stocks by 0.9 to 5.8 percentage points
Updated Oct 2, 2026QYLD
Income Watch
A 25.22% distribution rate met a -0.32% SEC yield as the 10-year paid 5.01%
Sep 20, 2026QYLD

Popular comparisons

FDNDDvsGPIQA
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF · Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.29%
Category
QYLDAvsGPIQA
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.29%
Category
FDNDDvsQQAA
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF · Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.29%
Category
QYLDAvsQQAA
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.29%
Category
FDNDDvsJEPQA
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF · JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.35%
Category
QYLDAvsJEPQA
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.35%
Category

FDND vs QYLD

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How FDND and QYLD differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in FDND

Only in QYLD

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

The four largest Nasdaq-100 income funds trailed the stocks by 0.9 to 5.8 percentage points

A 25.22% distribution rate met a -0.32% SEC yield as the 10-year paid 5.01%

How FDND and QYLD differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in FDND

Only in QYLD

Weight gaps