FELG ranks 4th and GK 78th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs GK
FELG −0.59pt a year
0.18%0.77%
FELG 284.0×the volume
368K1.3K
FELG vs GK Performance
−0.2%+3.2%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- GK 0.77%
- FELG $5.44B
- GK $28M
- FELG −0.2%
- GK +3.2%, better
- FELG 0.38%, better
- GK 0.08%
- FELG 137
- GK 26
- FELG 368K sh, better
- GK 1.3K sh
- FELG $41.08
- GK $25.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | GK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F15 |
| Mission | A82Higher | C45 |
| Risk | C53Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | C53Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A95Higher | D39 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and GK are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
GKD
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
GK A working wealth-management firm's conviction list, wrapped in an ETF. Active, US-only, about 30 growth stocks, benchmarked against the S&P 500. No index committee in the middle.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
GK The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed and invests primarily in U.S. exchange-traded equity securities through a focused portfolio of growth stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs GK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs GK Cost
Overpaying GK vs FELG
$11,080
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
GK 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | GK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,371 | $1,043 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $5,205 | $3,924 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $14,829 | $11,080 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.77%GK
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
GK 76th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs GK Dividends
- FELG 0.38%, better
- GK 0.08%
- FELG $0.16
- GK $0.02
- FELG $0.04
- GK $0.02
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- GK Dec 22, 2025
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- GK Dec 29, 2025
- FELG Quarterly
- GK Irregular
Distribution history
FELG vs GK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%GK 19.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93GK 0.84
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%GK −47.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.26GK 1.39
FELG and GK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
