LRGC ranks 3rd and FELG 4th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs LRGC
FELG −0.21pt a year
0.18%0.39%
FELG 11.1×the volume
379K34.1K
FELG vs LRGC Performance
−0.5%+9.5%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- LRGC 0.39%
- FELG $5.78B
- LRGC $1.37B
- FELG −0.5%
- LRGC +9.5%, better
- FELG 0.37%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- FELG 133
- LRGC 72
- FELG 379K sh, better
- LRGC 34.1K sh
- FELG $42.20
- LRGC $85.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A82 |
| Mission | A82Higher | A79 |
| Risk | C51 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | A75 |
| Holdings | C52 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | A78 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
LRGCA
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying LRGC vs FELG
$4,149
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $705 | $377 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,725 | $1,444 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $7,898 | $4,149 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.39%LRGC
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs LRGC Dividends
- FELG 0.37%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- FELG $0.16
- LRGC $0.45
- FELG $0.04
- LRGC $0.45
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- FELG Quarterly
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
FELG vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%LRGC 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93LRGC 1.26
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23LRGC 1.00
FELG and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

