QLVE ranks 7th and FEM 12th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FEM vs QLVE
QLVE −0.62pt a year
0.80%0.18%
FEM 246.5×the volume
99.6K404
FEM +0.9pt
+7.9%+7.0%
FEM vs QLVE Performance
+46.0%+40.2%
- FEM 0.80%
- QLVE 0.18%, better
- FEM $756M
- QLVE $16M
- FEM +17.7%, better
- QLVE +11.2%
- FEM 2.31%
- QLVE 3.17%, better
- FEM 163
- QLVE 155
- FEM 99.6K sh, better
- QLVE 404 sh
- FEM $30.94
- QLVE $32.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEM | QLVE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | B63 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | F11 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | D32 |
| Durability | A79Higher | D33 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FEM and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEMC
QLVEB
In short
FEM A 2011-vintage take on emerging markets that skips cap-weighting: it ranks stocks on growth and value factors, keeps the top scorers, and weights them in tiers, so the megacap giants don't run the portfolio. The fee sits at the high end.
QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
FEM The fund seeks results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Emerging Markets Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in index securities and uses indexing to replicate the index.
QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEM vs QLVE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEM vs QLVE Cost
Overpaying FEM vs QLVE
$11,597
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEM 0.80%
$15,346
QLVE 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEM | QLVE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $328 | $1,094 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $1,281 | $4,112 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $3,749 | $11,597 |
- 0.80%FEM
- 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QLVE cheapest of 20 funds
FEM 19th cheapest of 20 funds
FEM vs QLVE Dividends
- FEM 2.31%
- QLVE 3.17%, better
- FEM $0.72
- QLVE $1.02
- FEM $0.28
- QLVE $0.34
- FEM Sep 24, 2026
- QLVE Sep 18, 2026
- FEM Sep 30, 2026
- QLVE Sep 24, 2026
- FEM Quarterly
- QLVE Quarterly
Distribution history
FEM vs QLVE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FEM
- QLVE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEM 13.7%QLVE 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FEM 1.06QLVE 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- FEM −28.5%QLVE −23.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FEM 0.81QLVE 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.