Skip to content

FEM vs QLVE

First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund

FEMCNasdaq

Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

QLVEBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

QLVE −0.62pt a year

FEM0.80%QLVE0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

FEM 246.5×the volume

FEM99.6KQLVE404

5Y return · a year

FEM +0.9pt

FEM+7.9%QLVE+7.0%

FEM vs QLVE Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+46.0%FEM+40.2%QLVE

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FEM +46.0%. QLVE +40.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FEM 0.80%
QLVE 0.18%, better
Fund size
FEM $756M
QLVE $16M
1Y total return
FEM +17.7%, better
QLVE +11.2%
Yield (12M)
FEM 2.31%
QLVE 3.17%, better
Holdings
FEM 163
QLVE 155
Avg volume (30D)
FEM 99.6K sh, better
QLVE 404 sh
NAV per share
FEM $30.94
QLVE $32.48
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEM: Cost 3, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 75, Holdings 65, Durability 79. QLVE: Cost 100, Risk 66, Mission 93, Tradability 11, Holdings 32, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEM, QLVE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEMQLVE
Cost30% weightF3A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA93
Risk15% weightB63B66Higher
Tradability15% weightA75HigherF11
Holdings10% weightB65HigherD32
Durability5% weightA79HigherD33

Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEM and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

QLVE ranks 7th and FEM 12th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 6BJPEMJPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 62
  2. Rank 7BQLVENorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 8BROAMHartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 11CEQLTiShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETFScore 46
  5. Rank 12CFEMFirst Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX FundScore 42
  6. Rank 12CJHEMJohn Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEMCFirst Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund

QLVEBNorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

In short

FEM A 2011-vintage take on emerging markets that skips cap-weighting: it ranks stocks on growth and value factors, keeps the top scorers, and weights them in tiers, so the megacap giants don't run the portfolio. The fee sits at the high end.

QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.

Stated mandate

FEM The fund seeks results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Emerging Markets Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in index securities and uses indexing to replicate the index.

QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.

Why people hold it

  • FEM Ranks emerging-market stocks on growth and value factors, then weights the survivors in tiers, so the strongest scorers carry more weight than size alone would give them.nasdaqomx.com
  • Holds roughly 160 names under tiered equal weighting, leaving more room for mid-size and smaller companies than a cap-weighted EM benchmark.nasdaqomx.com
  • Running since 2011 through several EM cycles, with at least 90% of net assets in index securities and cash paid out quarterly.
  • A few hundred million in assets and moderate volume: no giant, but an established fund rather than a launch-stage one.
  • QLVE At 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027, it undercuts every top-scoring fund in its peer group, including EMGF at 0.26% and FDEM at 0.25%.
  • The index cuts the lowest-quality fifth of emerging-markets large and mid caps on profitability, cash flow and capital deployment, then optimizes the rest for lower volatility.flexshares.comnortherntrust.com
  • Sector, industry and country weights are held within set bands of the parent benchmark and turnover is capped near 12% a rebalance, curbing the sector drift low-vol screens invite.northerntrust.comsec.gov
  • Sits in the upper half of its emerging-markets factor peer group and has stayed close to its stated index.

Worth knowing

  • FEM At 0.80% a year it costs well above the median fee in its multifactor EM group, where cheaper builds exist (EMGF at 0.26%, AVES at 0.36%).
  • The factor screen and tiered weights can push results well away from headline cap-weighted EM indexes, in either direction.nasdaqomx.com
  • Country and sector weights fall out of the ranking rules, so nobody is steering exposure toward or away from a given market.nasdaqomx.com
  • QLVE Thinly traded with a small asset base, so spreads can run wider than the category heavyweights and limit orders matter more.
  • Roughly 160 holdings with meaningful weight in the largest names, so it is more top-heavy than a broad emerging-markets index fund.
  • Lower volatility is the design goal, not an outcome the fund controls: the index aims to be calmer than its parent, and the fund tracks it either way.sec.govflexshares.com

Full FEM profile⁠

Full QLVE profile⁠

FEM vs QLVE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEM vs QLVE Cost

Overpaying FEM vs QLVE

$11,597

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEM 0.80%

    $15,346

  • QLVE 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEM 0.80%
  • QLVE 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FEM $15,346QLVE $3,749

Year by year

YearFEMQLVEOverpaying
10$1,422$328$1,094
20$5,393$1,281$4,112
30$15,346$3,749$11,597

Expense ratio

  • 0.80%FEM
  • 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.44%

QLVE cheapest of 20 funds

FEM 19th cheapest of 20 funds

FEM vs QLVE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FEM 2.31%
QLVE 3.17%, better
Payout (12M)
FEM $0.72
QLVE $1.02
Last payment
FEM $0.28
QLVE $0.34
Ex-dividend
FEM Sep 24, 2026
QLVE Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
FEM Sep 30, 2026
QLVE Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
FEM Quarterly
QLVE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FEMQuarterly · 38 paymentsAll FEM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 38 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2017 $0.06; Jun 22, 2017 $0.18; Sep 21, 2017 $0.24; Dec 21, 2017 $0.21; Mar 22, 2018 $0.02; Jun 21, 2018 $0.30; Sep 14, 2018 $0.42; Dec 18, 2018 $0.07; Mar 21, 2019 $0.02; Jun 14, 2019 $0.33; Sep 25, 2019 $0.44; Dec 13, 2019 $0.09; Mar 26, 2020 $0.03; Jun 25, 2020 $0.20; Sep 24, 2020 $0.45; Mar 25, 2021 $0.03; Jun 24, 2021 $0.27; Sep 23, 2021 $0.55; Dec 23, 2021 $0.22; Mar 25, 2022 $0.01; Jun 24, 2022 $0.54; Sep 23, 2022 $0.54; Dec 23, 2022 $0.20; Mar 24, 2023 $0.04; Jun 27, 2023 $0.51; Sep 22, 2023 $0.46; Dec 22, 2023 $0.09; Mar 21, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.24; Sep 26, 2024 $0.32; Dec 13, 2024 $0.14; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.32; Sep 25, 2025 $0.28; Dec 12, 2025 $0.21; Mar 26, 2026 $0.03; Jun 25, 2026 $0.19; Sep 24, 2026 $0.28. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
QLVEQuarterly · 26 paymentsAll QLVE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 20, 2019 $0.11; Dec 20, 2019 $0.23; Mar 20, 2020 $0.0066; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.24; Dec 18, 2020 $0.03; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.24; Dec 17, 2021 $0.25; Jun 17, 2022 $0.17; Sep 16, 2022 $0.32; Dec 16, 2022 $0.06; Mar 17, 2023 $0.06; Jun 16, 2023 $0.15; Sep 15, 2023 $0.40; Dec 15, 2023 $0.09; Jun 21, 2024 $0.16; Sep 20, 2024 $0.09; Dec 20, 2024 $0.52; Mar 21, 2025 $0.09; Jun 20, 2025 $0.20; Sep 19, 2025 $0.21; Dec 19, 2025 $0.43; Dec 24, 2025 $0.0056; Jun 18, 2026 $0.24; Sep 18, 2026 $0.34. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FEM vs QLVE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FEM
  • QLVE
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FEM −28.5% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEM 13.7%QLVE 11.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEM 1.06QLVE 1.11, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEM −28.5%QLVE −23.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEM 0.81QLVE 0.83

Popular comparisons

  • FEMCvsEMGFA

    First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsEMGFA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMCvsAVESA

    First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsAVESA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMCvsFDEMA

    First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsFDEMA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.