Skip to content

FHDG vs XTR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF

FHDGDCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.60pt a year

FHDG0.85%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

FHDG 5.1×the volume

FHDG8.42KXTR1.64K

FHDG vs XTR Performance

Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+10.0%FHDG+6.1%XTR

Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. FHDG +10.0%. XTR +6.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FHDG 0.85%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
FHDG $71M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
FHDG +10.0%, better
XTR +6.1%
Yield (12M)
FHDG No data
XTR 16.85%
Holdings
FHDG 3
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
FHDG 8.42K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
FHDG $37.32
XTR $28.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FHDG: Cost 11, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 58, Durability 46. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 90, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for FHDG, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFHDGXTR
Cost30% weightF11A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76HigherF19
Tradability15% weightC45HigherF13
Holdings10% weightB58A90Higher
Durability5% weightC46C46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FHDG and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

XTR ranks 58th and FHDG 64th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 58CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  2. Rank 58CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  3. Rank 64DFHDGFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 39
  4. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FHDGDFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

FHDG Most buffer funds lock in one cushion for a full year. FHDG resets every three months and lets the cushion itself flex between 5.0% and 7.5% of S&P 500 losses, with a fresh upside cap set each period.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

FHDG The Fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an upside cap, while dynamically buffering either 5.0% or 7.5% of losses over approximately three months.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • FHDG The buffer isn't fixed. Each roughly three-month period opens with either 5.0% or 7.5% of downside absorbed, sized to what the options market can fund at the time.ftportfolios.com
  • Quarterly resets mean four fresh starts a year, so one awkward entry point doesn't set the terms for the next twelve months.
  • The reference is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses. No bespoke index to decode, just the benchmark most investors already track.
  • Sits in the upper half of a crowded shallow-buffer peer group, helped by day-to-day tradability that holds up against bigger names.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • FHDG At 0.85% a year it runs above the typical fund in its buffer cohort, and above shallow-buffer alternatives like ZALT (0.69%) and BUFB (0.10%).
  • The cap is reset each period, losses past the 5.0% or 7.5% buffer pass through in full, and the reference is a price return, so dividends don't come along.ftportfolios.com
  • Launched in late 2024, so the history is short, and the buffer math only lands as designed for holders who own it from one period start to the next.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full FHDG profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

FHDG vs XTR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FHDG vs XTR Cost

Overpaying FHDG vs XTR

$11,040

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FHDG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FHDG 0.85%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FHDG $16,199XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearFHDGXTROverpaying
10$1,508$455$1,053
20$5,706$1,769$3,937
30$16,199$5,159$11,040

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FHDG
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

FHDG 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FHDG vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
FHDG No data
XTR 16.85%
Payout (12M)
FHDG None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
FHDG No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
FHDG No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
FHDG No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
FHDG No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

FHDGAll FHDG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

FHDG vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FHDG 5.6%since Dec 2024XTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FHDG 1.02since Dec 2024XTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FHDG −14.0%since Nov 2024XTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FHDG 0.44XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • FHDGDvsZALTA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHDGDvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsSIXJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHDGDvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.