FHLC ranks 2nd and FXH 10th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
FHLC vs FXH
FHLC −0.53pt a year
0.08%0.61%
FHLC 4.4×the volume
246K56.5K
FHLC +2.7pt
+12.4%+9.7%
FHLC vs FXH Performance
+42.8%+16.1%
- FHLC 0.08%, better
- FXH 0.61%
- FHLC $3.54B
- FXH $1.16B
- FHLC +28.9%, better
- FXH +24.1%
- FHLC 1.15%, better
- FXH 0.54%
- FHLC 345
- FXH 73
- FHLC 246K sh, better
- FXH 56.5K sh
- FHLC $88.53
- FXH $137.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FHLC | FXH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | D33 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | A82Higher | A78 |
| Holdings | C54 | A82Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | B67 |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. FHLC and FXH are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FHLCA
FXHB
In short
FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.
FXH A 2007-vintage twist on health care: instead of owning the whole sector, FXH runs Russell 1000 health care names through First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value screen and holds roughly 80 of them.
Stated mandate
FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.
FXH The fund seeks before-fee results generally corresponding to the price and yield of the StrataQuant® Health Care Index. That index uses the AlphaDEX® methodology to select and weight health care stocks from the Russell 1000® Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FHLC vs FXH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FHLC vs FXH Cost
Overpaying FXH vs FHLC
$10,225
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FHLC 0.084%
$1,773
FXH 0.61%
$11,998
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FHLC | FXH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $1,093 | $939 |
| 20 | $603 | $4,181 | $3,578 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $11,998 | $10,225 |
- 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
- 0.61%FXH
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
FXH 17th cheapest of 25 funds
FHLC vs FXH Dividends
- FHLC 1.15%, better
- FXH 0.54%
- FHLC $1.02
- FXH $0.74
- FHLC $0.25
- FXH $0.29
- FHLC Sep 18, 2026
- FXH Sep 24, 2026
- FHLC Sep 22, 2026
- FXH Sep 30, 2026
- FHLC Quarterly
- FXH Quarterly
Distribution history
FHLC vs FXH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FHLC
- FXH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FHLC 14.5%FXH 14.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FHLC 0.83, betterFXH 0.78
- Worst fall
- FHLC −17.7%, betterFXH −27.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FHLC 0.59FXH 0.72
FHLC and FXH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

