VHT ranks 3rd and FXH 10th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
FXH vs VHT
VHT −0.52pt a year
0.61%0.09%
VHT 4.2×the volume
56.5K237K
VHT +2.7pt
+9.7%+12.4%
FXH vs VHT Performance
+16.1%+42.5%
- FXH 0.61%
- VHT 0.09%, better
- FXH $1.16B
- VHT $21.8B
- FXH +24.1%
- VHT +28.7%, better
- FXH 0.54%
- VHT 1.35%, better
- FXH 73
- VHT 413
- FXH 56.5K sh
- VHT 237K sh, better
- FXH $137.20
- VHT $342.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FXH | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | A70 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A78Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | B58 |
| Durability | B67 | A92Higher |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. FXH and VHT are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FXHB
VHTA
In short
FXH A 2007-vintage twist on health care: instead of owning the whole sector, FXH runs Russell 1000 health care names through First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value screen and holds roughly 80 of them.
VHT The whole US health care sector in one ticket: roughly 400 stocks, an index that reaches well past the megacaps, and a nine-basis-point fee. Trading since 2004, it is one of the category's originals.
Stated mandate
FXH The fund seeks before-fee results generally corresponding to the price and yield of the StrataQuant® Health Care Index. That index uses the AlphaDEX® methodology to select and weight health care stocks from the Russell 1000® Index.
VHT The fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of health care stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FXH vs VHT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FXH vs VHT Cost
Overpaying FXH vs VHT
$10,100
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FXH 0.61%
$11,998
VHT 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FXH | VHT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,093 | $165 | $928 |
| 20 | $4,181 | $646 | $3,535 |
| 30 | $11,998 | $1,898 | $10,100 |
- 0.61%FXH
- 0.09%VHT, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
VHT 3rd cheapest of 25 funds
FXH 17th cheapest of 25 funds
FXH vs VHT Dividends
- FXH 0.54%
- VHT 1.35%, better
- FXH $0.74
- VHT $4.61
- FXH $0.29
- VHT $0.97
- FXH Sep 24, 2026
- VHT Sep 23, 2026
- FXH Sep 30, 2026
- VHT Sep 25, 2026
- FXH Quarterly
- VHT Quarterly
Distribution history
FXH vs VHT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FXH
- VHT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FXH 14.3%, betterVHT 14.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FXH 0.78VHT 0.83, better
- Worst fall
- FXH −27.6%VHT −17.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FXH 0.72VHT 0.59
FXH and VHT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.61% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

