FITE ranks 1st and THMZ 7th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
FITE vs THMZ
FITE −0.05pt a year
0.45%0.50%
FITE 3.5×the volume
7.11K2.01K
FITE vs THMZ Performance
+24.6%+2.1%
- FITE 0.45%, better
- THMZ 0.50%
- FITE $161M
- THMZ $54M
- FITE +24.6%, better
- THMZ +2.1%
- FITE 0.11%
- THMZ 0.41%, better
- FITE 79
- THMZ 63
- FITE 7.11K sh, better
- THMZ 2.01K sh
- FITE $115.25
- THMZ $33.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FITE | THMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | B67 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A71Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | A79 |
| Durability | A82Higher | C47 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. FITE and THMZ are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FITEA
THMZB
In short
FITE Most "security" funds mean cybersecurity. FITE reads the word wider: cyber plus border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and AR/VR, bundled into one global index basket since 2017.
THMZ Most thematic ETFs make you pick one trend and live with it. Lazard's megatrends fund is actively run across several themes at once, holding about 60 established companies worldwide and measuring itself against the global stock market.
Stated mandate
FITE The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Future Security Index, targeting companies whose products and services support future security through areas such as cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables, and virtual or augmented reality.
THMZ THMZ is the ticker shown for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF on NASDAQ.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FITE vs THMZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FITE vs THMZ Cost
Overpaying THMZ vs FITE
$938
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FITE 0.45%
$9,041
THMZ 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FITE | THMZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $900 | $88 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $3,460 | $332 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $9,979 | $938 |
- 0.45%FITE, cheaper
- 0.50%THMZ
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
FITE 3rd cheapest of 18 funds
THMZ 7th cheapest of 18 funds
FITE vs THMZ Dividends
- FITE 0.11%
- THMZ 0.41%, better
- FITE $0.12
- THMZ $0.14
- FITE $0.04
- THMZ $0.06
- FITE Sep 21, 2026
- THMZ Sep 18, 2026
- FITE Sep 23, 2026
- THMZ Sep 21, 2026
- FITE Quarterly
- THMZ Quarterly
Distribution history
FITE vs THMZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FITE 21.9%THMZ 14.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FITE 1.26THMZ 0.67
- Worst fall
- FITE −27.1%THMZ −16.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FITE 1.32THMZ 1.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.