Skip to content

FITE vs THMZ

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

FITEANYSE Arca

Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF

THMZBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

FITE −0.05pt a year

FITE0.45%THMZ0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

FITE 3.5×the volume

FITE7.11KTHMZ2.01K

FITE vs THMZ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+24.6%FITE+2.1%THMZ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FITE +24.6%. THMZ +2.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%10%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FITE 0.45%, better
THMZ 0.50%
Fund size
FITE $161M
THMZ $54M
1Y total return
FITE +24.6%, better
THMZ +2.1%
Yield (12M)
FITE 0.11%
THMZ 0.41%, better
Holdings
FITE 79
THMZ 63
Avg volume (30D)
FITE 7.11K sh, better
THMZ 2.01K sh
NAV per share
FITE $115.25
THMZ $33.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FITE: Cost 83, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 82, Durability 82. THMZ: Cost 67, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 79, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for FITE, THMZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFITETHMZ
Cost30% weightA83HigherB67
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA71HigherC52
Tradability15% weightA78HigherD27
Holdings10% weightA82HigherA79
Durability5% weightA82HigherC47

Rank among Global Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FITE and THMZ are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

FITE ranks 1st and THMZ 7th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 6BTRFKPacer Data and Digital Revolution ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 7BTHMZLazard Equity Megatrends ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 8CCOPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FITEAState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

THMZBLazard Equity Megatrends ETF

In short

FITE Most "security" funds mean cybersecurity. FITE reads the word wider: cyber plus border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and AR/VR, bundled into one global index basket since 2017.

THMZ Most thematic ETFs make you pick one trend and live with it. Lazard's megatrends fund is actively run across several themes at once, holding about 60 established companies worldwide and measuring itself against the global stock market.

Stated mandate

FITE The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Future Security Index, targeting companies whose products and services support future security through areas such as cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables, and virtual or augmented reality.

THMZ THMZ is the ticker shown for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF on NASDAQ.

Why people hold it

  • FITE One theme, many fronts: cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and virtual/augmented reality all sit inside the same index.ssga.com
  • A 0.45% fee undercuts the typical global thematic fund, and it comes from State Street's SPDR lineup rather than a one-fund boutique.
  • Live since 2017, so it has traded through a full cycle of thematic hype and hangover instead of arriving on a back-test.
  • Roughly 80 names spread across sectors and countries, so no single defense contractor or chipmaker steers the whole portfolio.ssga.com
  • THMZ Multi-theme by design: rather than one trend in a wrapper, the managers spread roughly 60 global holdings across several megatrends and let the theme mix evolve, with the MSCI All Country World Index as the yardstick.lazardassetmanagement.comlazardassetmanagement.com 2
  • 0.50% net of a fee waiver (0.60% gross) sits below the median for global thematic funds, and level with AGNG, the aging-population ETF, at 0.50%.
  • The mandate leans on established companies generally above $5 billion in market cap, emerging markets included. Blue-chip megatrends, not micro-cap moonshots.lazardassetmanagement.com
  • Portfolio construction stands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group, and the fund pays distributions quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • FITE Thinly traded next to broad index funds, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads at the moment you transact.
  • Small by SPDR standards. Niche thematic funds lean on sustained investor interest to hold their scale.
  • "Security" is drawn by index rules, so wearables and AR headset makers land beside the cyber and border names.
  • THMZ No published index sits behind it. Which megatrends make the cut, and which names express them, is the manager's call, so there is nothing external to grade the stock picking against.lazardassetmanagement.com
  • Trading is thin next to the giant index names, so the bid-ask gap can be wider and large orders need more care.
  • It launched in 2025, so the record is short, and index-tracking rivals cost less: WRND charges 0.18% net of a fee waiver.

Full FITE profile⁠

Full THMZ profile⁠

FITE vs THMZ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FITE vs THMZ Cost

Overpaying THMZ vs FITE

$938

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FITE 0.45%

    $9,041

  • THMZ 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FITE 0.45%
  • THMZ 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530THMZ $9,979FITE $9,041

Year by year

YearFITETHMZOverpaying
10$812$900$88
20$3,128$3,460$332
30$9,041$9,979$938

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%FITE, cheaper
  • 0.50%THMZ
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

FITE 3rd cheapest of 18 funds

THMZ 7th cheapest of 18 funds

FITE vs THMZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FITE 0.11%
THMZ 0.41%, better
Payout (12M)
FITE $0.12
THMZ $0.14
Last payment
FITE $0.04
THMZ $0.06
Ex-dividend
FITE Sep 21, 2026
THMZ Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
FITE Sep 23, 2026
THMZ Sep 21, 2026
Frequency
FITE Quarterly
THMZ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

FITEQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll FITE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 33 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 19, 2018 $0.02; Jun 18, 2018 $0.02; Sep 24, 2018 $0.01; Dec 24, 2018 $0.47; Mar 18, 2019 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.01; Sep 23, 2019 $0.05; Dec 23, 2019 $0.06; Mar 23, 2020 $0.31; Jun 22, 2020 $0.02; Dec 21, 2020 $0.08; Mar 22, 2021 $0.28; Jun 21, 2021 $0.0094; Sep 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2021 $0.07; Mar 21, 2022 $0.0097; Jun 21, 2022 $0.02; Dec 19, 2022 $0.02; Mar 20, 2023 $0.0037; Jun 20, 2023 $0.02; Sep 18, 2023 $0.02; Dec 18, 2023 $0.03; Mar 18, 2024 $0.03; Jun 24, 2024 $0.02; Sep 23, 2024 $0.02; Dec 23, 2024 $0.0071; Mar 24, 2025 $0.05; Jun 23, 2025 $0.04; Sep 22, 2025 $0.06; Dec 22, 2025 $0.04; Mar 23, 2026 $0.03; Jun 22, 2026 $0.01; Sep 21, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
THMZQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll THMZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2025 $0.10; Dec 19, 2025 $0.004; Mar 20, 2026 $0.04; Jun 18, 2026 $0.04; Sep 18, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

FITE vs THMZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FITE 21.9%THMZ 14.2%since May 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FITE 1.26THMZ 0.67since May 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FITE −27.1%THMZ −16.0%since Apr 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FITE 1.32THMZ 1.09

Popular comparisons

  • FITEAvsAGNGA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMZBvsAGNGA

    Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FITEAvsWRNDB

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMZBvsWRNDB

    Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FITEAvsICOPB

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMZBvsICOPB

    Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.