Skip to content

THMZ vs WRND

Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF

THMZBNasdaq

NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

WRNDBNasdaq

Overlap

29.3%by weight

Expense ratio

WRND −0.32pt a year

THMZ0.50%WRND0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

THMZ 3.8×the volume

THMZ2.01KWRND532

THMZ vs WRND Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.1%THMZ+9.3%WRND

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. THMZ +2.1%. WRND +9.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
THMZ 0.50%
WRND 0.18%, better
Fund size
THMZ $54M
WRND $11M
1Y total return
THMZ +2.1%
WRND +9.3%, better
Yield (12M)
THMZ 0.41%
WRND 0.97%, better
Holdings
THMZ 63
WRND 208
Avg volume (30D)
THMZ 2.01K sh, better
WRND 532 sh
NAV per share
THMZ $33.96
WRND $40.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

THMZ: Cost 67, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 79, Durability 47. WRND: Cost 100, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 15, Holdings 58, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for THMZ, WRND, with each pillar’s weight
PillarTHMZWRND
Cost30% weightB67A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC52A76Higher
Tradability15% weightD27HigherF15
Holdings10% weightA79HigherB58
Durability5% weightC47C47

Rank among Global Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. THMZ and WRND are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

WRND ranks 3rd and THMZ 7th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BWRNDNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 6BTRFKPacer Data and Digital Revolution ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 7BTHMZLazard Equity Megatrends ETFScore 56
  7. Rank 8CCOPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

THMZBLazard Equity Megatrends ETF

WRNDBNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

In short

THMZ Most thematic ETFs make you pick one trend and live with it. Lazard's megatrends fund is actively run across several themes at once, holding about 60 established companies worldwide and measuring itself against the global stock market.

WRND Most innovation funds sell you a story. WRND buys receipts: roughly 200 companies worldwide picked on what they actually spend on R&D and whether that spending earns a return, at a fee well under the thematic norm.

Stated mandate

THMZ THMZ is the ticker shown for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF on NASDAQ.

WRND The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index. Its passive strategy targets innovative companies worldwide based on high research and development spending.

Why people hold it

  • THMZ Multi-theme by design: rather than one trend in a wrapper, the managers spread roughly 60 global holdings across several megatrends and let the theme mix evolve, with the MSCI All Country World Index as the yardstick.lazardassetmanagement.comlazardassetmanagement.com 2
  • 0.50% net of a fee waiver (0.60% gross) sits below the median for global thematic funds, and level with AGNG, the aging-population ETF, at 0.50%.
  • The mandate leans on established companies generally above $5 billion in market cap, emerging markets included. Blue-chip megatrends, not micro-cap moonshots.lazardassetmanagement.com
  • Portfolio construction stands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group, and the fund pays distributions quarterly.
  • WRND 0.18% a year against a 0.56% median for its global thematic peers. Innovation exposure without the boutique markup.newyorklifeinvestments.com
  • Selection leans on the income statement: R&D intensity paired with return on invested capital, favoring firms that turn research budgets into results.newyorklifeinvestments.com
  • Roughly 200 names from a global universe, one of three R&D-screened funds New York Life launched in 2022 rather than a one-off experiment.businesswire.com

Worth knowing

  • THMZ No published index sits behind it. Which megatrends make the cut, and which names express them, is the manager's call, so there is nothing external to grade the stock picking against.lazardassetmanagement.com
  • Trading is thin next to the giant index names, so the bid-ask gap can be wider and large orders need more care.
  • It launched in 2025, so the record is short, and index-tracking rivals cost less: WRND charges 0.18% net of a fee waiver.
  • WRND Small and lightly traded, so bid/ask spreads tend to run wider than on mainstream global index funds.
  • Weighting by R&D dollars, with a cap on any single position, tilts the book toward the world's largest research spenders.businesswire.cometfstrategy.com
  • Distributions arrive quarterly, but income isn't the mandate; the index screens on research spending, not payouts.

Full THMZ profile⁠

Full WRND profile⁠

THMZ vs WRND Holdings

How THMZ and WRND differ

Overlap by weight

29.3%

Shared holdings make up 44.7% of WRND and 41.1% of THMZ.

Level by level

  • Holdings19 in both29.3%
  • Countryby domicile75.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for THMZ.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in THMZ and WRND, widest gap first
CountryMore in THMZMore in WRND
JapanTHMZ +9.3 points
NetherlandsWRND +5.1 points
South KoreaWRND +5.0 points
GermanyWRND +4.7 points
SwedenTHMZ +3.8 points
TaiwanWRND +3.2 points
IndiaTHMZ +2.7 points
FranceTHMZ +2.1 points
Other countries (16)THMZ +0.1 points

Outside the US: THMZ 71% developed, 29% emerging. WRND 51% developed, 49% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • THMZ31.8%
  • WRND47.1%

Securities held

  • THMZ60
  • WRND208

Asset class

THMZ
Equity
WRND
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in THMZ41
  • In both19
  • Only in WRND189

Only in THMZ

41 securities, 59.2% of THMZ by weight

  • Taiwan Semiconductor Sp Adr5.47%
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc2.67%
  • Danaher Corp2.33%

Only in WRND

189 securities, 55.4% of WRND by weight

  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.4.57%
  • ASML Holding NV4.46%
  • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.4.05%

Weight gaps

All 19 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in THMZ and WRND, widest gap first
HoldingMore in THMZMore in WRND
Apple IncAAPLWRND +4.97 points
NVIDIA CorpNVDAWRND +4.21 points
Applied Materials IncAMATTHMZ +2.69 points
Alphabet Inc Class AGOOGLWRND +2.64 points
Keysight Technologies InKEYSTHMZ +2.34 points
Hexagon Ab B ShsTHMZ +1.60 points
Amphenol Corp Class AAPHTHMZ +1.45 points
Qualcomm IncQCOMTHMZ +1.19 points

All 60 THMZ holdings⁠All 209 WRND holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

THMZ vs WRND Cost

Overpaying THMZ vs WRND

$6,230

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • THMZ 0.50%

    $9,979

  • WRND 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • THMZ 0.50%
  • WRND 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530THMZ $9,979WRND $3,749

Year by year

YearTHMZWRNDOverpaying
10$900$328$572
20$3,460$1,281$2,179
30$9,979$3,749$6,230

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%THMZ
  • 0.18%WRND, cheaper
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

WRND cheapest of 18 funds

THMZ 7th cheapest of 18 funds

THMZ vs WRND Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
THMZ 0.41%
WRND 0.97%, better
Payout (12M)
THMZ $0.14
WRND $0.40
Last payment
THMZ $0.06
WRND $0.10
Ex-dividend
THMZ Sep 18, 2026
WRND Sep 30, 2026
Paid on
THMZ Sep 21, 2026
WRND Oct 2, 2026
Frequency
THMZ Quarterly
WRND Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

THMZQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll THMZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2025 $0.10; Dec 19, 2025 $0.004; Mar 20, 2026 $0.04; Jun 18, 2026 $0.04; Sep 18, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
WRNDQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll WRND payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 18, 2022 $0.06; Jun 17, 2022 $0.17; Sep 16, 2022 $0.08; Dec 16, 2022 $0.11; Mar 31, 2023 $0.11; Jun 30, 2023 $0.08; Sep 29, 2023 $0.15; Dec 15, 2023 $0.21; Jun 28, 2024 $0.16; Sep 30, 2024 $0.11; Dec 30, 2024 $0.06; Mar 31, 2025 $0.11; Jun 30, 2025 $0.18; Sep 30, 2025 $0.09; Dec 30, 2025 $0.11; Mar 31, 2026 $0.05; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14; Sep 30, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

THMZ vs WRND Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
THMZ 14.2%since May 2025WRND 14.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
THMZ 0.67since May 2025WRND 1.18
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
THMZ −16.0%since Apr 2025WRND −27.2%since Feb 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
THMZ 1.09WRND 1.15

Popular comparisons

  • THMZBvsFITEA

    Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WRNDBvsFITEA

    NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMZBvsAGNGA

    Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WRNDBvsAGNGA

    NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMZBvsICOPB

    Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WRNDBvsICOPB

    NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.