FLCA ranks 1st and FSZ 25th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
FLCA vs FSZ
FLCA −0.71pt a year
0.09%0.80%
FLCA 54.7×the volume
47.9K875
FLCA +5.8pt
+11.5%+5.7%
FLCA vs FSZ Performance
+72.6%+32.0%
- FLCA 0.09%, better
- FSZ 0.80%
- FLCA $851M
- FSZ $37M
- FLCA +24.0%, better
- FSZ +12.0%
- FLCA 1.69%
- FSZ 1.96%, better
- FLCA 92
- FSZ 41
- FLCA 47.9K sh, better
- FSZ 875 sh
- FLCA $53.71
- FSZ $82.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCA | FSZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F4 |
| Mission | B67 | A73Higher |
| Risk | A89Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | A81 | A81 |
| Durability | C53Higher | C47 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. FLCA and FSZ are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCAA
FSZC
In short
FLCA Canada in one ticker, at index-fund pricing. FLCA tracks the FTSE Canada Capped Index, about 50 large- and mid-cap Canadian names, for 0.09% a year.
FSZ A Switzerland fund that doesn't just mirror the Swiss market. FSZ runs Swiss stocks through First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value rules and lands on about 40 names, so the screen shapes results as much as the country does.
Stated mandate
FLCA The fund seeks to track the FTSE Canada Capped Index, which measures the performance of Canadian large- and mid-capitalization stocks.
FSZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® SwitzerlandTM Index. That index selects and weights Swiss securities from the Nasdaq SwitzerlandTM Index using AlphaDEX criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCA vs FSZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCA vs FSZ Cost
Overpaying FSZ vs FLCA
$13,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCA 0.09%
$1,898
FSZ 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCA | FSZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $1,422 | $1,257 |
| 20 | $646 | $5,393 | $4,747 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $15,346 | $13,448 |
- 0.09%FLCA, cheaper
- 0.80%FSZ
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLCA cheapest of 38 funds
FSZ 37th cheapest of 38 funds
FLCA vs FSZ Dividends
- FLCA 1.69%
- FSZ 1.96%, better
- FLCA $0.92
- FSZ $1.64
- FLCA $0.39
- FSZ $0.81
- FLCA Jun 26, 2026
- FSZ Jun 25, 2026
- FLCA Jul 6, 2026
- FSZ Jun 30, 2026
- FLCA Twice a year
- FSZ Quarterly
Distribution history
FLCA vs FSZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLCA
- FSZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCA 13.1%, betterFSZ 13.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCA 1.54, betterFSZ 0.82
- Worst fall
- FLCA −24.2%, betterFSZ −34.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FLCA 0.81FSZ 0.76
FLCA and FSZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

