FLGB ranks 3rd and FSZ 25th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
FLGB vs FSZ
FLGB −0.71pt a year
0.09%0.80%
FLGB 120.1×the volume
105K875
FLGB +6.4pt
+12.1%+5.7%
FLGB vs FSZ Performance
+77.2%+32.0%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- FSZ 0.80%
- FLGB $872M
- FSZ $37M
- FLGB +16.9%, better
- FSZ +12.0%
- FLGB 2.84%, better
- FSZ 1.96%
- FLGB 88
- FSZ 41
- FLGB 105K sh, better
- FSZ 875 sh
- FLGB $36.55
- FSZ $82.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLGB | FSZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F4 |
| Mission | A73 | A73 |
| Risk | A76Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | A73 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C53Higher | C47 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. FLGB and FSZ are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLGBA
FSZC
In short
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
FSZ A Switzerland fund that doesn't just mirror the Swiss market. FSZ runs Swiss stocks through First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value rules and lands on about 40 names, so the screen shapes results as much as the country does.
Stated mandate
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
FSZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® SwitzerlandTM Index. That index selects and weights Swiss securities from the Nasdaq SwitzerlandTM Index using AlphaDEX criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLGB vs FSZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLGB vs FSZ Cost
Overpaying FSZ vs FLGB
$13,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
FSZ 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLGB | FSZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $1,422 | $1,257 |
| 20 | $646 | $5,393 | $4,747 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $15,346 | $13,448 |
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- 0.80%FSZ
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
FSZ 37th cheapest of 38 funds
FLGB vs FSZ Dividends
- FLGB 2.84%, better
- FSZ 1.96%
- FLGB $1.06
- FSZ $1.64
- FLGB $0.47
- FSZ $0.81
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- FSZ Jun 25, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- FSZ Jun 30, 2026
- FLGB Twice a year
- FSZ Quarterly
Distribution history
FLGB vs FSZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLGB
- FSZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLGB 11.0%, betterFSZ 13.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLGB 1.44, betterFSZ 0.82
- Worst fall
- FLGB −25.9%, betterFSZ −34.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FLGB 0.75FSZ 0.76
FLGB and FSZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


