BBCA ranks 4th and FSZ 25th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
BBCA vs FSZ
BBCA −0.61pt a year
0.19%0.80%
BBCA 401.8×the volume
352K875
BBCA +5.6pt
+11.3%+5.7%
BBCA vs FSZ Performance
+70.9%+32.0%
- BBCA 0.19%, better
- FSZ 0.80%
- BBCA $11.9B
- FSZ $37M
- BBCA +24.4%, better
- FSZ +12.0%
- BBCA 1.67%
- FSZ 1.96%, better
- BBCA 78
- FSZ 41
- BBCA 352K sh, better
- FSZ 875 sh
- BBCA $103.43
- FSZ $82.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBCA | FSZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | F4 |
| Mission | B60 | A73Higher |
| Risk | A89Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | B58Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | A77 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B58Higher | C47 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. BBCA and FSZ are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBCAA
FSZC
In short
BBCA Canada, at a discount. BBCA tracks a Morningstar index of roughly 80 Canadian stocks for 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country funds charge, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund since its 2018 launch.
FSZ A Switzerland fund that doesn't just mirror the Swiss market. FSZ runs Swiss stocks through First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value rules and lands on about 40 names, so the screen shapes results as much as the country does.
Stated mandate
BBCA The fund seeks to track the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive indexing approach to approximate the index rather than outperform it.
FSZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® SwitzerlandTM Index. That index selects and weights Swiss securities from the Nasdaq SwitzerlandTM Index using AlphaDEX criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBCA vs FSZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBCA vs FSZ Cost
Overpaying FSZ vs BBCA
$11,394
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBCA 0.19%
$3,952
FSZ 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBCA | FSZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $1,422 | $1,075 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $5,393 | $4,042 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $15,346 | $11,394 |
- 0.19%BBCA, cheaper
- 0.80%FSZ
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
BBCA 7th cheapest of 38 funds
FSZ 37th cheapest of 38 funds
BBCA vs FSZ Dividends
- BBCA 1.67%
- FSZ 1.96%, better
- BBCA $1.75
- FSZ $1.64
- BBCA $0.42
- FSZ $0.81
- BBCA Sep 22, 2026
- FSZ Jun 25, 2026
- BBCA Sep 24, 2026
- FSZ Jun 30, 2026
- BBCA Quarterly
- FSZ Quarterly
Distribution history
BBCA vs FSZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBCA
- FSZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBCA 12.9%, betterFSZ 13.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBCA 1.55, betterFSZ 0.82
- Worst fall
- BBCA −24.4%, betterFSZ −34.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BBCA 0.86FSZ 0.76
BBCA and FSZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

