JUSA ranks 1st and FLCG 9th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FLCG vs JUSA
JUSA −0.21pt a year
0.39%0.18%
JUSA 1.3×the volume
75.3K98.8K
FLCG vs JUSA Performance
−0.3%+10.8%
- FLCG 0.39%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- FLCG $702M
- JUSA $745M
- FLCG −0.3%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- FLCG 0.05%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- FLCG 101
- JUSA 263
- FLCG 75.3K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- FLCG $34.35
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCG | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | B59 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | C54 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B68 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FLCG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCGB
JUSAA
In short
FLCG Federated Hermes dropped its decades-old MDT quant engine into an ETF in 2024: a bottom-up model picks roughly 100 large-cap growth names from the Russell 1000 Growth universe, aiming for an edge without straying far from the benchmark.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
FLCG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCG vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCG vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying FLCG vs JUSA
$4,149
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCG 0.39%
$7,898
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCG | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $328 | $377 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $1,281 | $1,444 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $3,749 | $4,149 |
- 0.39%FLCG
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
FLCG 14th cheapest of 90 funds
FLCG vs JUSA Dividends
- FLCG 0.05%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- FLCG $0.02
- JUSA $0.49
- FLCG $0.02
- JUSA $0.13
- FLCG Dec 31, 2025
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- FLCG Jan 2, 2026
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- FLCG Irregular
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
FLCG vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCG 16.1%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCG 0.62JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- FLCG −23.0%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FLCG 1.14JUSA 0.98
FLCG and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

