FLCH ranks 2nd and MAGC 17th of 28 funds in the China Category.
FLCH vs MAGC
FLCH −0.41pt a year
0.19%0.60%
FLCH 16.3×the volume
108K6.65K
FLCH vs MAGC Performance
−20.9%−34.3%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- MAGC 0.60%
- FLCH $252M
- MAGC $12M
- FLCH −20.9%, better
- MAGC −34.3%
- FLCH 2.63%
- MAGC 5.76%, better
- FLCH 1112
- MAGC 16
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- MAGC 6.65K sh
- FLCH $19.38
- MAGC $16.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCH | MAGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B67 |
| Mission | A87Higher | C50 |
| Risk | B64Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | F16 |
| Durability | A70Higher | D36 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. FLCH and MAGC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCHA
MAGCC
In short
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
MAGC One ticker, seven of China's biggest tech and EV names, equal weighted and rebalanced quarterly. Roundhill's China answer to its own Magnificent Seven fund, and it charges 0.60%.
Stated mandate
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
MAGC The fund seeks equal-weight exposure to the largest and most innovative Chinese companies identified as the China Magnificent Seven.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCH vs MAGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCH vs MAGC Cost
Overpaying MAGC vs FLCH
$7,865
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
MAGC 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCH | MAGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $1,076 | $729 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $4,116 | $2,765 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $11,817 | $7,865 |
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- 0.60%MAGC
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
MAGC 9th cheapest of 28 funds
FLCH vs MAGC Dividends
- FLCH 2.63%
- MAGC 5.76%, better
- FLCH $0.51
- MAGC $0.98
- FLCH $0.14
- MAGC $0.98
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- MAGC Dec 30, 2025
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- MAGC Dec 31, 2025
- FLCH Twice a year
- MAGC Irregular
Distribution history
FLCH vs MAGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCH 21.1%MAGC 28.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCH 0.29MAGC −1.58
- Worst fall
- FLCH −48.1%MAGC −42.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FLCH 0.55MAGC −0.07
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.