Skip to content

FLCH vs MAGC

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCHANYSE Arca

Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF

MAGCCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLCH −0.41pt a year

FLCH0.19%MAGC0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

FLCH 16.3×the volume

FLCH108KMAGC6.65K

FLCH vs MAGC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−20.9%FLCH−34.3%MAGC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FLCH −20.9%. MAGC −34.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−10%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FLCH 0.19%, better
MAGC 0.60%
Fund size
FLCH $252M
MAGC $12M
1Y total return
FLCH −20.9%, better
MAGC −34.3%
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.63%
MAGC 5.76%, better
Holdings
FLCH 1112
MAGC 16
Avg volume (30D)
FLCH 108K sh, better
MAGC 6.65K sh
NAV per share
FLCH $19.38
MAGC $16.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLCH: Cost 100, Risk 64, Mission 87, Tradability 62, Holdings 65, Durability 70. MAGC: Cost 67, Risk 21, Mission 50, Tradability 53, Holdings 16, Durability 36.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLCH, MAGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLCHMAGC
Cost30% weightA100HigherB67
Mission25% weightA87HigherC50
Risk15% weightB64HigherF21
Tradability15% weightB62HigherC53
Holdings10% weightB65HigherF16
Durability5% weightA70HigherD36

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLCH and MAGC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

FLCH ranks 2nd and MAGC 17th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 15CPGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 17CMAGCRoundhill China Magnificent Seven ETFScore 47
  6. Rank 18CCHIQGlobal X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLCHAFranklin FTSE China ETF

MAGCCRoundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF

In short

FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.

MAGC One ticker, seven of China's biggest tech and EV names, equal weighted and rebalanced quarterly. Roundhill's China answer to its own Magnificent Seven fund, and it charges 0.60%.

Stated mandate

FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

MAGC The fund seeks equal-weight exposure to the largest and most innovative Chinese companies identified as the China Magnificent Seven.

Why people hold it

  • FLCH 0.19% a year, against a roughly 0.70% median for China funds. It also undercuts the category stalwarts MCHI and GXC, both at 0.59%.
  • About 1,000 holdings, so you own the long tail of Chinese listings rather than a short list of mega-cap headline names.
  • One job, done tightly: mirror the FTSE China RIC Capped Index before fees. On tracking it ranks among the strongest builds in its China peer group.sec.gov
  • MAGC Equal weight, rebalanced quarterly, so no single giant swallows the basket the way it can in cap-weighted China index funds.roundhillinvestments.com
  • Blue-chip roster only: names such as Alibaba, Tencent and BYD, picked with size and liquidity screens, which skips Chinese small caps entirely.roundhillinvestments.comroundhillinvestments.com 2
  • At 0.60% with no fee waiver, it sits near the median of 30 China funds we track, unusual for a hand-picked, actively managed basket.
  • Roundhill launched it in 2024 and bills it as the first ETF built around this precise basket of China's tech leaders.roundhillinvestments.com

Worth knowing

  • FLCH It is China or nothing. Policy shifts, regulatory news and the currency drive the ride, with no other market in the basket to cushion it.
  • Mid-sized and only moderately traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can bite more on larger orders.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly. This is an equity index vehicle, not an income schedule.
  • MAGC Seven companies means one bad quarter at one of them lands hard. Broad China funds spread that risk across hundreds of stocks.roundhillinvestments.com
  • Much of the exposure comes via total return swaps on ADRs (to meet fund diversification tests), backed by Treasury bills, not direct share ownership.roundhillinvestments.comroundhillinvestments.com 2
  • Small and thinly traded, with distributions once or twice a year. Cheaper, broader options like FLCH (0.19%) and CXSE (0.32%) rank at the top of the category.

Full FLCH profile⁠

Full MAGC profile⁠

FLCH vs MAGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLCH vs MAGC Cost

Overpaying MAGC vs FLCH

$7,865

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLCH 0.19%

    $3,952

  • MAGC 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLCH 0.19%
  • MAGC 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530MAGC $11,817FLCH $3,952

Year by year

YearFLCHMAGCOverpaying
10$347$1,076$729
20$1,351$4,116$2,765
30$3,952$11,817$7,865

Expense ratio

  • 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
  • 0.60%MAGC
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

FLCH cheapest of 28 funds

MAGC 9th cheapest of 28 funds

FLCH vs MAGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.63%
MAGC 5.76%, better
Payout (12M)
FLCH $0.51
MAGC $0.98
Last payment
FLCH $0.14
MAGC $0.98
Ex-dividend
FLCH Jun 26, 2026
MAGC Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
FLCH Jul 6, 2026
MAGC Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
FLCH Twice a year
MAGC Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLCHTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLCH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.00084; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.29; Jun 11, 2019 $0.03; Dec 11, 2019 $0.46; Jun 11, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.25; Jun 10, 2021 $0.03; Dec 13, 2021 $0.34; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Dec 16, 2022 $0.36; Jun 16, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.37; Jun 21, 2024 $0.12; Dec 20, 2024 $0.41; Jun 20, 2025 $0.19; Dec 19, 2025 $0.37; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
MAGCIrregular · 2 paymentsAll MAGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2024 $0.22; Dec 30, 2025 $0.98. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

FLCH vs MAGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLCH 21.1%MAGC 28.2%since Oct 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLCH 0.29MAGC −1.58since Oct 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLCH −48.1%MAGC −42.0%since Sep 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLCH 0.55MAGC −0.07

Popular comparisons

  • FLCHAvsCXSEA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MAGCCvsCXSEA

    Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsMCHIA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MAGCCvsMCHIA

    Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsGXCA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MAGCCvsGXCA

    Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.