MCHI ranks 3rd and MAGC 17th of 28 funds in the China Category.
MAGC vs MCHI
MCHI −0.01pt a year
0.60%0.59%
MCHI 336.5×the volume
6.65K2.24M
MAGC vs MCHI Performance
−32.1%−20.5%
- MAGC 0.60%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- MAGC $12M
- MCHI $5.49B
- MAGC −32.1%
- MCHI −20.5%, better
- MAGC 5.57%, better
- MCHI 2.21%
- MAGC 16
- MCHI 581
- MAGC 6.65K sh
- MCHI 2.24M sh, better
- MAGC $17.53
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MAGC | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67 | A78Higher |
| Mission | C50 | A87Higher |
| Risk | F21 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | F16 | B57Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. MAGC and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MAGCC
MCHIA
In short
MAGC One ticker, seven of China's biggest tech and EV names, equal weighted and rebalanced quarterly. Roundhill's China answer to its own Magnificent Seven fund, and it charges 0.60%.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
MAGC The fund seeks equal-weight exposure to the largest and most innovative Chinese companies identified as the China Magnificent Seven.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MAGC vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MAGC vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying MAGC vs MCHI
$182
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MAGC 0.60%
$11,817
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MAGC | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,058 | $18 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $4,051 | $65 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $11,635 | $182 |
- 0.60%MAGC
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
MAGC 9th cheapest of 28 funds
MAGC vs MCHI Dividends
- MAGC 5.57%, better
- MCHI 2.21%
- MAGC $0.98
- MCHI $1.10
- MAGC $0.98
- MCHI $0.36
- MAGC Dec 30, 2025
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- MAGC Dec 31, 2025
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- MAGC Irregular
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
MAGC vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MAGC 28.2%MCHI 21.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- MAGC −1.58MCHI 0.26
- Worst fall
- MAGC −42.0%MCHI −49.2%
- Market sensitivity
- MAGC −0.07MCHI 0.63
MAGC and MCHI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





