Skip to content

MAGC vs MCHI

Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF

MAGCCCboe

iShares MSCI China ETF

MCHIANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

MCHI −0.01pt a year

MAGC0.60%MCHI0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

MCHI 336.5×the volume

MAGC6.65KMCHI2.24M

MAGC vs MCHI Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−32.1%MAGC−20.5%MCHI

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. MAGC −32.1%. MCHI −20.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
MAGC 0.60%
MCHI 0.59%, better
Fund size
MAGC $12M
MCHI $5.49B
1Y total return
MAGC −32.1%
MCHI −20.5%, better
Yield (12M)
MAGC 5.57%, better
MCHI 2.21%
Holdings
MAGC 16
MCHI 581
Avg volume (30D)
MAGC 6.65K sh
MCHI 2.24M sh, better
NAV per share
MAGC $17.53
MCHI $48.89
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MAGC: Cost 67, Risk 21, Mission 50, Tradability 53, Holdings 16, Durability 36. MCHI: Cost 78, Risk 63, Mission 87, Tradability 88, Holdings 57, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for MAGC, MCHI, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMAGCMCHI
Cost30% weightB67A78Higher
Mission25% weightC50A87Higher
Risk15% weightF21B63Higher
Tradability15% weightC53A88Higher
Holdings10% weightF16B57Higher
Durability5% weightD36A91Higher

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MAGC and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

MCHI ranks 3rd and MAGC 17th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 1AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 4AGXCState Street SPDR S&P China ETFScore 76
  5. Rank 15CPGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 17CMAGCRoundhill China Magnificent Seven ETFScore 47
  7. Rank 18CCHIQGlobal X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MAGCCRoundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF

MCHIAiShares MSCI China ETF

In short

MAGC One ticker, seven of China's biggest tech and EV names, equal weighted and rebalanced quarterly. Roundhill's China answer to its own Magnificent Seven fund, and it charges 0.60%.

MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.

Stated mandate

MAGC The fund seeks equal-weight exposure to the largest and most innovative Chinese companies identified as the China Magnificent Seven.

MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.

Why people hold it

  • MAGC Equal weight, rebalanced quarterly, so no single giant swallows the basket the way it can in cap-weighted China index funds.roundhillinvestments.com
  • Blue-chip roster only: names such as Alibaba, Tencent and BYD, picked with size and liquidity screens, which skips Chinese small caps entirely.roundhillinvestments.comroundhillinvestments.com 2
  • At 0.60% with no fee waiver, it sits near the median of 30 China funds we track, unusual for a hand-picked, actively managed basket.
  • Roundhill launched it in 2024 and bills it as the first ETF built around this precise basket of China's tech leaders.roundhillinvestments.com
  • MCHI One ticker, roughly 600 Chinese stocks. Instead of picking among share classes and listings, you get the MSCI China Index (Net) in a single line item.ishares.com
  • 0.59% expense ratio, below the middle of the single-country China pack, and the fund has hewed closely to its stated index mandate.
  • Running since 2011 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, which is why it turns up as the reference China holding in so many portfolios.
  • One of the stronger implementations in its peer group on tradability and staying power, both scored in the top tier of the China cohort.

Worth knowing

  • MAGC Seven companies means one bad quarter at one of them lands hard. Broad China funds spread that risk across hundreds of stocks.roundhillinvestments.com
  • Much of the exposure comes via total return swaps on ADRs (to meet fund diversification tests), backed by Treasury bills, not direct share ownership.roundhillinvestments.comroundhillinvestments.com 2
  • Small and thinly traded, with distributions once or twice a year. Cheaper, broader options like FLCH (0.19%) and CXSE (0.32%) rank at the top of the category.
  • MCHI Cheaper broad-China options exist: FLCH charges 0.19% and JPMorgan's active JCHI 0.15%. You are paying up for MCHI's depth and liquidity.
  • Single-country equity risk, undiluted. Chinese regulation, currency and policy swings hit the whole basket at once, and the index leans heavily on its biggest names.
  • Distributions come once or twice a year, not monthly, so cash flow arrives in lumps.

Full MAGC profile⁠

Full MCHI profile⁠

MAGC vs MCHI Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MAGC vs MCHI Cost

Overpaying MAGC vs MCHI

$182

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MAGC 0.60%

    $11,817

  • MCHI 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MAGC 0.60%
  • MCHI 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530MAGC $11,817MCHI $11,635

Year by year

YearMAGCMCHIOverpaying
10$1,076$1,058$18
20$4,116$4,051$65
30$11,817$11,635$182

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%MAGC
  • 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds

MAGC 9th cheapest of 28 funds

MAGC vs MCHI Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
MAGC 5.57%, better
MCHI 2.21%
Payout (12M)
MAGC $0.98
MCHI $1.10
Last payment
MAGC $0.98
MCHI $0.36
Ex-dividend
MAGC Dec 30, 2025
MCHI Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
MAGC Dec 31, 2025
MCHI Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
MAGC Irregular
MCHI Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

MAGCIrregular · 2 paymentsAll MAGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2024 $0.22; Dec 30, 2025 $0.98. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
MCHITwice a year · 19 paymentsAll MCHI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.19; Dec 19, 2017 $0.85; Jun 19, 2018 $0.32; Dec 18, 2018 $0.53; Jun 17, 2019 $0.36; Dec 16, 2019 $0.57; Jun 15, 2020 $0.24; Dec 14, 2020 $0.60; Jun 10, 2021 $0.18; Dec 13, 2021 $0.48; Jun 9, 2022 $0.31; Dec 13, 2022 $0.71; Jun 7, 2023 $0.43; Dec 20, 2023 $0.99; Jun 11, 2024 $0.19; Dec 17, 2024 $0.89; Jun 16, 2025 $0.54; Dec 16, 2025 $0.74; Jun 15, 2026 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

MAGC vs MCHI Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MAGC 28.2%since Oct 2025MCHI 21.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MAGC −1.58since Oct 2025MCHI 0.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MAGC −42.0%since Sep 2025MCHI −49.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MAGC −0.07MCHI 0.63

MAGC and MCHI in the news

Popular comparisons

  • MAGCCvsCXSEA

    Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHIAvsCXSEA

    iShares MSCI China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MAGCCvsFLCHA

    Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHIAvsFLCHA

    iShares MSCI China ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MAGCCvsGXCA

    Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHIAvsGXCA

    iShares MSCI China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.