FLDZ ranks 3rd and WDAF 12th of 25 funds in the Defense & Aerospace Category.
FLDZ vs WDAF
FLDZ −0.05pt a year
0.40%0.45%
WDAF 61.4×the volume
1257.68K
FLDZ vs WDAF Performance
−6.8%−19.2%
- FLDZ 0.40%, better
- WDAF 0.45%
- FLDZ $7M
- WDAF $9M
- FLDZ −6.8%, better
- WDAF −19.2%
- FLDZ 1.67%
- WDAF
- FLDZ 66
- WDAF 71
- FLDZ 125 sh
- WDAF 7.68K sh, better
- FLDZ $26.38
- WDAF $25.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLDZ | WDAF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76Higher | B66 |
| Mission | C42 | |
| Risk | C42Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | D36Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | A92Higher | C42 |
| Durability | B62Higher | C47 |
Rank among Defense & Aerospace funds
Same Category. FLDZ and WDAF are both graded against the same 25 Defense & Aerospace funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLDZB
WDAFC
In short
FLDZ A defense-stock ETF with an unusual arrangement: the adviser's management fee, less fund expenses, goes to the Folds of Honor Foundation. Launched in 2021 as a patriot-themed core equity fund, it now runs an active, concentrated book of aerospace and defense names.
WDAF Most defense ETFs are a story about the US primes. WDAF flips the map: a rules-based basket of Asia-Pacific defense names, weighted toward the companies that earn the biggest share of their revenue from defense.
Stated mandate
FLDZ The Fund seeks capital growth.
WDAF The Fund seeks to follow the pre-fee price and yield performance of the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index. It uses passive indexing with representative sampling and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in index constituents or economically similar investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLDZ vs WDAF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLDZ vs WDAF Cost
Overpaying WDAF vs FLDZ
$951
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLDZ 0.40%
$8,090
WDAF 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLDZ | WDAF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $812 | $89 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $3,128 | $335 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $9,041 | $951 |
- 0.40%FLDZ, cheaper
- 0.45%WDAF
- Middle half of Defense & Aerospace funds
- Median 0.50%
FLDZ 6th cheapest of 25 funds
WDAF 7th cheapest of 25 funds
FLDZ vs WDAF Dividends
- FLDZ 1.67%
- WDAF
- FLDZ $0.45
- WDAF
- FLDZ $0.45
- WDAF $0.04
- FLDZ Dec 24, 2025
- WDAF Dec 26, 2025
- FLDZ Dec 26, 2025
- WDAF Dec 30, 2025
- FLDZ Annual
- WDAF Irregular
Distribution history
FLDZ vs WDAF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLDZ 14.5%WDAF 37.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLDZ 0.35WDAF −0.49
- Worst fall
- FLDZ −25.1%WDAF −34.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FLDZ 0.77WDAF 1.24
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.