ITA ranks 2nd and WDAF 12th of 25 funds in the Defense & Aerospace Category.
ITA vs WDAF
ITA −0.08pt a year
0.37%0.45%
ITA 97.2×the volume
747K7.68K
ITA vs WDAF Performance
−0.3%−19.2%
- ITA 0.37%, better
- WDAF 0.45%
- ITA $12.2B
- WDAF $9M
- ITA −0.3%, better
- WDAF −19.2%
- ITA 0.26%
- WDAF
- ITA 52
- WDAF 71
- ITA 747K sh, better
- WDAF 7.68K sh
- ITA $209.66
- WDAF $25.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ITA | WDAF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | B66 |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | B62Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | A96Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | D34 | C42Higher |
| Durability | A98Higher | C47 |
Rank among Defense & Aerospace funds
Same Category. ITA and WDAF are both graded against the same 25 Defense & Aerospace funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ITAA
WDAFC
In short
ITA The 2006 original in aerospace and defense, and still the anchor fund of the category. It follows a market-cap-weighted index of U.S. aircraft, parts and weapons makers, so the big primes carry most of the weight.
WDAF Most defense ETFs are a story about the US primes. WDAF flips the map: a rules-based basket of Asia-Pacific defense names, weighted toward the companies that earn the biggest share of their revenue from defense.
Stated mandate
ITA The fund is designed to follow an index of U.S. equity companies focused on aerospace and defense.
WDAF The Fund seeks to follow the pre-fee price and yield performance of the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index. It uses passive indexing with representative sampling and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in index constituents or economically similar investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ITA vs WDAF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ITA vs WDAF Cost
Overpaying WDAF vs ITA
$1,528
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ITA 0.37%
$7,513
WDAF 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ITA | WDAF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $812 | $142 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $3,128 | $538 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $9,041 | $1,528 |
- 0.37%ITA, cheaper
- 0.45%WDAF
- Middle half of Defense & Aerospace funds
- Median 0.50%
ITA 5th cheapest of 25 funds
WDAF 7th cheapest of 25 funds
ITA vs WDAF Dividends
- ITA 0.26%
- WDAF
- ITA $0.57
- WDAF
- ITA $0.25
- WDAF $0.04
- ITA Sep 15, 2026
- WDAF Dec 26, 2025
- ITA Sep 18, 2026
- WDAF Dec 30, 2025
- ITA Quarterly
- WDAF Irregular
Distribution history
ITA vs WDAF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ITA 18.5%WDAF 37.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ITA 1.06WDAF −0.49
- Worst fall
- ITA −20.0%WDAF −34.6%
- Market sensitivity
- ITA 0.98WDAF 1.24
ITA and WDAF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





