FLGB ranks 3rd and KMCA 38th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
FLGB vs KMCA
FLGB −0.56pt a year
0.09%0.65%
FLGB 17.5×the volume
105K6K
FLGB vs KMCA Performance
−2.3%−23.5%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- KMCA 0.65%
- FLGB $872M
- KMCA $4M
- FLGB +14.5%
- KMCA
- FLGB 2.91%
- KMCA
- FLGB 88
- KMCA 36
- FLGB 105K sh, better
- KMCA 6K sh
- FLGB $36.55
- KMCA $14.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLGB | KMCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A73 | |
| Risk | A76Higher | F4 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | F6 |
| Holdings | A73Higher | F10 |
| Durability | C53Higher | F5 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. FLGB and KMCA are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLGBA
KMCAF
In short
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
KMCA Korea, minus the index filler. KMCA holds roughly 40 companies in the industries Korea actually dominates: AI chips, batteries, shipyards, defense, power grid and nuclear, robotics. Hanwha's PLUS lineup, wrapped for US buyers.
Stated mandate
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
KMCA The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the performance of an index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLGB vs KMCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLGB vs KMCA Cost
Overpaying KMCA vs FLGB
$10,819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
KMCA 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLGB | KMCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $1,163 | $998 |
| 20 | $646 | $4,440 | $3,794 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $12,717 | $10,819 |
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- 0.65%KMCA
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
KMCA 35th cheapest of 38 funds
FLGB vs KMCA Dividends
- FLGB 2.91%
- KMCA
- FLGB $1.06
- KMCA None
- FLGB $0.47
- KMCA
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- KMCA
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- KMCA
- FLGB Twice a year
- KMCA
Distribution history
FLGB vs KMCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLGB 11.0%KMCA
- Return per unit of risk
- FLGB 1.44KMCA
- Worst fall
- FLGB −25.9%KMCA
- Market sensitivity
- FLGB 0.75KMCA 0.00
FLGB and KMCA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


