FLJH ranks 3rd and GSJY 7th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
FLJH vs GSJY
FLJH −0.16pt a year
0.09%0.25%
FLJH 4.8×the volume
34.3K7.19K
FLJH +11.5pt
+20.7%+9.2%
FLJH vs GSJY Performance
+156.4%+55.5%
- FLJH 0.09%, better
- GSJY 0.25%
- FLJH $201M
- GSJY $98M
- FLJH +21.9%, better
- GSJY +15.9%
- FLJH 6.20%, better
- GSJY 2.02%
- FLJH 448
- GSJY 162
- FLJH 34.3K sh, better
- GSJY 7.19K sh
- FLJH $44.77
- GSJY $54.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLJH | GSJY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A82 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B62Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C52Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B64 |
| Durability | C53 | C54Higher |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. FLJH and GSJY are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLJHA
GSJYB
In short
FLJH Japan stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. FLJH hedges the currency back to dollars for 0.09% a year, the same fee as Franklin's unhedged twin and a fraction of the typical Japan fund.
GSJY Most Japan ETFs just buy the market. GSJY runs Goldman's ActiveBeta screen instead, tilting a basket of roughly 220 Japanese stocks toward value, momentum, quality and low volatility for a quarter-percent fee.
Stated mandate
FLJH The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan Capped Hedged Index through passive indexing, using replication or representative sampling.
GSJY The fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLJH vs GSJY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLJH vs GSJY Cost
Overpaying GSJY vs FLJH
$3,261
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLJH 0.09%
$1,898
GSJY 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLJH | GSJY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $455 | $290 |
| 20 | $646 | $1,769 | $1,123 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $5,159 | $3,261 |
- 0.09%FLJH, cheaper
- 0.25%GSJY
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJH cheapest of 18 funds
GSJY 4th cheapest of 18 funds
FLJH vs GSJY Dividends
- FLJH 6.20%, better
- GSJY 2.02%
- FLJH $2.74
- GSJY $1.07
- FLJH $0.29
- GSJY $0.41
- FLJH Jun 26, 2026
- GSJY Jun 24, 2026
- FLJH Jul 6, 2026
- GSJY Jun 30, 2026
- FLJH Twice a year
- GSJY Twice a year
Distribution history
FLJH vs GSJY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLJH
- GSJY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLJH 12.5%GSJY 12.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLJH 1.59, betterGSJY 1.19
- Worst fall
- FLJH −20.4%, betterGSJY −28.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FLJH 0.62GSJY 0.92
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.