FLJH ranks 4th and MJSC 15th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
FLJH vs MJSC
FLJH −0.92pt a year
0.09%1.01%
FLJH 17.1×the volume
34.4K2.02K
FLJH vs MJSC Performance
+22.2%+15.4%
- FLJH 0.09%, better
- MJSC 1.01%
- FLJH $188M
- MJSC $20M
- FLJH +22.2%, better
- MJSC +15.4%
- FLJH 6.22%
- MJSC
- FLJH 447
- MJSC 97
- FLJH 34.4K sh, better
- MJSC 2.02K sh
- FLJH $41.82
- MJSC $53.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLJH | MJSC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F9 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B64Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | C49Higher | D28 |
| Holdings | A74 | A75Higher |
| Durability | C54Higher | F22 |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. FLJH and MJSC are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLJHA
MJSCC
In short
FLJH Japan stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. FLJH hedges the currency back to dollars for 0.09% a year, the same fee as Franklin's unhedged twin and a fraction of the typical Japan fund.
MJSC MUFG's first US-listed ETF: an active Tokyo stock-picking desk digging through Japanese small caps, roughly 100 names deep, in a category otherwise run by index trackers.
Stated mandate
FLJH The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan Capped Hedged Index through passive indexing, using replication or representative sampling.
MJSC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLJH vs MJSC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLJH vs MJSC Cost
Overpaying MJSC vs FLJH
$16,952
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLJH 0.09%
$1,898
MJSC 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLJH | MJSC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $1,780 | $1,615 |
| 20 | $646 | $6,686 | $6,040 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $18,850 | $16,952 |
- 0.09%FLJH, cheaper
- 1.01%MJSC
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJH cheapest of 18 funds
MJSC 16th cheapest of 18 funds
FLJH vs MJSC Dividends
- FLJH 6.22%
- MJSC
- FLJH $2.74
- MJSC
- FLJH $0.29
- MJSC $0.33
- FLJH Jun 26, 2026
- MJSC Dec 30, 2025
- FLJH Jul 6, 2026
- MJSC Dec 31, 2025
- FLJH Twice a year
- MJSC Irregular
Distribution history
FLJH vs MJSC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLJH 12.4%MJSC 22.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLJH 1.60MJSC 0.61
- Worst fall
- FLJH −20.4%MJSC −14.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FLJH 0.64MJSC 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.