FLKR ranks 14th and FSZ 25th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
FLKR vs FSZ
FLKR −0.71pt a year
0.09%0.80%
FLKR 961.8×the volume
842K875
FLKR +8.9pt
+14.6%+5.7%
FLKR vs FSZ Performance
+98.1%+32.0%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- FSZ 0.80%
- FLKR $1.57B
- FSZ $37M
- FLKR +60.7%, better
- FSZ +12.0%
- FLKR 3.12%, better
- FSZ 1.96%
- FLKR 148
- FSZ 41
- FLKR 842K sh, better
- FSZ 875 sh
- FLKR $45.14
- FSZ $82.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLKR | FSZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F4 |
| Mission | B57 | A73Higher |
| Risk | F23 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C49Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | C53 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B60Higher | C47 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. FLKR and FSZ are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLKRB
FSZC
In short
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
FSZ A Switzerland fund that doesn't just mirror the Swiss market. FSZ runs Swiss stocks through First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value rules and lands on about 40 names, so the screen shapes results as much as the country does.
Stated mandate
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
FSZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® SwitzerlandTM Index. That index selects and weights Swiss securities from the Nasdaq SwitzerlandTM Index using AlphaDEX criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLKR vs FSZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLKR vs FSZ Cost
Overpaying FSZ vs FLKR
$13,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
FSZ 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLKR | FSZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $1,422 | $1,257 |
| 20 | $646 | $5,393 | $4,747 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $15,346 | $13,448 |
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- 0.80%FSZ
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
FSZ 37th cheapest of 38 funds
FLKR vs FSZ Dividends
- FLKR 3.12%, better
- FSZ 1.96%
- FLKR $1.47
- FSZ $1.64
- FLKR $0.30
- FSZ $0.81
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- FSZ Jun 25, 2026
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- FSZ Jun 30, 2026
- FLKR Twice a year
- FSZ Quarterly
Distribution history
FLKR vs FSZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLKR
- FSZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLKR 43.0%FSZ 13.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLKR 0.97, betterFSZ 0.82
- Worst fall
- FLKR −41.3%FSZ −34.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLKR 2.57FSZ 0.76
FLKR and FSZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





