HYLB ranks 3rd and FLXN 64th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
FLXN vs HYLB
HYLB −0.77pt a year
0.82%0.05%
HYLB 29.8×the volume
40.9K1.22M
FLXN vs HYLB Performance
+3.7%+1.9%
- FLXN 0.82%
- HYLB 0.05%, better
- FLXN $53M
- HYLB $3.3B
- FLXN +3.7%, better
- HYLB +1.9%
- FLXN 11.49%, better
- HYLB 6.73%
- FLXN 5
- HYLB 1280
- FLXN 40.9K sh
- HYLB 1.22M sh, better
- FLXN $23.92
- HYLB $35.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLXN | HYLB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C47 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | F22 | A88Higher |
| Durability | F17 | A77Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. FLXN and HYLB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLXNC
HYLBA
In short
FLXN High yield with a dimmer switch: an active fund of ETFs whose risk-timing model dials credit exposure up or down, with put spreads layered on for income and downside cushioning. The 0.82% fee (no waiver) buys the tactics, not the beta.
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
FLXN The fund seeks current income. It is actively managed, invests primarily in non-investment-grade fixed-income instruments, and uses a risk-timing model plus options strategies to adjust exposure, generate income, and manage downside risk.
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLXN vs HYLB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLXN vs HYLB Cost
Overpaying FLXN vs HYLB
$14,629
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLXN 0.82%
$15,689
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLXN | HYLB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,457 | $92 | $1,365 |
| 20 | $5,519 | $360 | $5,159 |
| 30 | $15,689 | $1,060 | $14,629 |
- 0.82%FLXN
- 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
FLXN 80th cheapest of 84 funds
FLXN vs HYLB Dividends
- FLXN 11.49%, better
- HYLB 6.73%
- FLXN $2.74
- HYLB $2.37
- FLXN $0.23
- HYLB $0.20
- FLXN Oct 29, 2026
- HYLB Oct 1, 2026
- FLXN Oct 30, 2026
- HYLB Oct 8, 2026
- FLXN Monthly
- HYLB Monthly
Distribution history
FLXN vs HYLB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLXN 4.0%HYLB 4.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLXN 0.32HYLB 0.82
- Worst fall
- FLXN −3.4%HYLB −15.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FLXN 0.08HYLB 0.66
Popular comparisons
- 0.82% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.82% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.82% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.