SCYB ranks 1st and FLXN 64th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
FLXN vs SCYB
SCYB −0.79pt a year
0.82%0.03%
SCYB 27.0×the volume
40.9K1.1M
FLXN vs SCYB Performance
+3.7%+2.0%
- FLXN 0.82%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- FLXN $53M
- SCYB $2.8B
- FLXN +3.7%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- FLXN 11.49%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- FLXN 5
- SCYB 1844
- FLXN 40.9K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- FLXN $23.92
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLXN | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C47 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | F22 | A99Higher |
| Durability | F17 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. FLXN and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLXNC
SCYBA
In short
FLXN High yield with a dimmer switch: an active fund of ETFs whose risk-timing model dials credit exposure up or down, with put spreads layered on for income and downside cushioning. The 0.82% fee (no waiver) buys the tactics, not the beta.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
FLXN The fund seeks current income. It is actively managed, invests primarily in non-investment-grade fixed-income instruments, and uses a risk-timing model plus options strategies to adjust exposure, generate income, and manage downside risk.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLXN vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLXN vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying FLXN vs SCYB
$15,051
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLXN 0.82%
$15,689
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLXN | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,457 | $55 | $1,402 |
| 20 | $5,519 | $216 | $5,303 |
| 30 | $15,689 | $638 | $15,051 |
- 0.82%FLXN
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
FLXN 80th cheapest of 84 funds
FLXN vs SCYB Dividends
- FLXN 11.49%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- FLXN $2.74
- SCYB $1.80
- FLXN $0.23
- SCYB $0.16
- FLXN Oct 29, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- FLXN Oct 30, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- FLXN Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
FLXN vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLXN 4.0%SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLXN 0.32SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- FLXN −3.4%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FLXN 0.08SCYB 0.28
FLXN and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.82% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.82% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.82% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
