IWR ranks 4th and FMDE 10th of 13 funds in the US Mid-Cap Category.
FMDE vs IWR
IWR −0.05pt a year
0.23%0.18%
IWR 2.0×the volume
914K1.79M
FMDE vs IWR Performance
+17.9%+16.6%
- FMDE 0.23%
- IWR 0.18%, better
- FMDE $8.09B
- IWR $58.1B
- FMDE +17.9%, better
- IWR +16.6%
- FMDE 1.04%
- IWR 1.15%, better
- FMDE 537
- IWR 827
- FMDE 914K sh
- IWR 1.79M sh, better
- FMDE $41.55
- IWR $110.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMDE | IWR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | C43Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B69 | B69 |
| Tradability | B65 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | C50 | A83Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A86Higher |
Rank among US Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. FMDE and IWR are both graded against the same 13 US Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMDEC
IWRA
In short
FMDE A 2007-vintage Fidelity quant strategy that spent 16 years as a mutual fund, then reorganized into an ETF in 2023 at roughly half the old fee. Same multifactor machinery, aimed at the mid-cap tier.
IWR The Russell mid-cap standard: roughly 800 mid-sized US companies in one ticker, tracked since 2001. Big, heavily traded, and priced a notch above the index-fund floor.
Stated mandate
FMDE The fund seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative investment process that balances risk and return. It uses multifactor statistical models to select companies with desirable fundamental characteristics.
IWR The fund seeks to track an index composed of mid-sized U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMDE vs IWR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMDE vs IWR Cost
Overpaying FMDE vs IWR
$1,010
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMDE 0.23%
$4,759
IWR 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMDE | IWR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $328 | $91 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $1,281 | $349 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $3,749 | $1,010 |
- 0.23%FMDE
- 0.18%IWR, cheaper
- Middle half of US Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.15%
IWR 8th cheapest of 13 funds
FMDE 9th cheapest of 13 funds
FMDE vs IWR Dividends
- FMDE 1.04%
- IWR 1.15%, better
- FMDE $0.43
- IWR $1.27
- FMDE $0.12
- IWR $0.33
- FMDE Sep 18, 2026
- IWR Sep 15, 2026
- FMDE Sep 22, 2026
- IWR Sep 18, 2026
- FMDE Quarterly
- IWR Quarterly
Distribution history
FMDE vs IWR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMDE 13.2%IWR 14.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FMDE 1.10IWR 1.08
- Worst fall
- FMDE −21.1%IWR −26.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FMDE 0.91IWR 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.