XLV ranks 1st and FMED 14th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
FMED vs XLV
XLV −0.42pt a year
0.50%0.08%
XLV 1109.0×the volume
8.21K9.1M
FMED +1.1pt
+17.1%+16.0%
FMED vs XLV Performance
+23.6%+30.3%
- FMED 0.50%
- XLV 0.08%, better
- FMED $52M
- XLV $48.5B
- FMED +23.6%
- XLV +30.3%, better
- FMED 0.00%
- XLV 1.38%, better
- FMED 75
- XLV 64
- FMED 8.21K sh
- XLV 9.1M sh, better
- FMED $32.47
- XLV $184.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMED | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C52 | A98Higher |
| Mission | B68 | A84Higher |
| Risk | C44 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A77Higher | D39 |
| Durability | C48 | A87Higher |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. FMED and XLV are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMEDC
XLVA
In short
FMED Fidelity's stock-picking take on health care: roughly 60 global companies its managers judge to be disrupting medicine. Actively run, deliberately concentrated, and priced right at the median fee for broad health care funds.
XLV Live since 1998, XLV is the original way to own health care: about 60 S&P 500 names, a 0.08% fee, and one of the busiest tickers in the sector. Big pharma and device makers, not small-cap biotech.
Stated mandate
FMED The fund seeks long-term growth of capital and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of disruptive medicine companies.
XLV The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Health Care Select Sector Index, which represents the health care sector of the S&P 500 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMED vs XLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMED vs XLV Cost
Overpaying FMED vs XLV
$8,290
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMED 0.50%
$9,979
XLV 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMED | XLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $147 | $753 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $575 | $2,885 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,689 | $8,290 |
- 0.50%FMED
- 0.08%XLV, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
XLV cheapest of 25 funds
FMED 12th cheapest of 25 funds
FMED vs XLV Dividends
- FMED 0.00%
- XLV 1.38%, better
- FMED None
- XLV $2.55
- FMED
- XLV $0.64
- FMED
- XLV Sep 21, 2026
- FMED
- XLV Sep 23, 2026
- FMED
- XLV Quarterly
Distribution history
FMED vs XLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMED 18.4%XLV 14.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FMED 0.71XLV 0.78, better
- Worst fall
- FMED −21.8%XLV −17.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FMED 0.77XLV 0.56
FMED and XLV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





