VHT ranks 3rd and FMED 14th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
FMED vs VHT
VHT −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
VHT 28.8×the volume
8.21K237K
VHT +0.3pt
+15.5%+15.8%
FMED vs VHT Performance
+20.3%+28.3%
- FMED 0.50%
- VHT 0.09%, better
- FMED $52M
- VHT $21.8B
- FMED +20.3%
- VHT +28.3%, better
- FMED 0.00%
- VHT 1.35%, better
- FMED 75
- VHT 416
- FMED 8.21K sh
- VHT 237K sh, better
- FMED $32.47
- VHT $342.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMED | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C52 | A92Higher |
| Mission | B68 | A82Higher |
| Risk | C44 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | A77Higher | B58 |
| Durability | C48 | A92Higher |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. FMED and VHT are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMEDC
VHTA
In short
FMED Fidelity's stock-picking take on health care: roughly 60 global companies its managers judge to be disrupting medicine. Actively run, deliberately concentrated, and priced right at the median fee for broad health care funds.
VHT The whole US health care sector in one ticket: roughly 400 stocks, an index that reaches well past the megacaps, and a nine-basis-point fee. Trading since 2004, it is one of the category's originals.
Stated mandate
FMED The fund seeks long-term growth of capital and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of disruptive medicine companies.
VHT The fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of health care stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMED vs VHT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMED vs VHT Cost
Overpaying FMED vs VHT
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMED 0.50%
$9,979
VHT 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMED | VHT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%FMED
- 0.09%VHT, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
VHT 3rd cheapest of 25 funds
FMED 12th cheapest of 25 funds
FMED vs VHT Dividends
- FMED 0.00%
- VHT 1.35%, better
- FMED None
- VHT $4.61
- FMED
- VHT $0.97
- FMED
- VHT Sep 23, 2026
- FMED
- VHT Sep 25, 2026
- FMED
- VHT Quarterly
Distribution history
FMED vs VHT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMED 18.4%VHT 14.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FMED 0.71VHT 0.83, better
- Worst fall
- FMED −21.8%VHT −17.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FMED 0.77VHT 0.58
FMED and VHT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

