FHLC ranks 2nd and FMED 14th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
FHLC vs FMED
FHLC −0.42pt a year
0.08%0.50%
FHLC 30.0×the volume
246K8.21K
FHLC +0.3pt
+15.8%+15.5%
FHLC vs FMED Performance
+28.5%+20.3%
- FHLC 0.08%, better
- FMED 0.50%
- FHLC $3.54B
- FMED $52M
- FHLC +28.5%, better
- FMED +20.3%
- FHLC 1.15%, better
- FMED 0.00%
- FHLC 344
- FMED 75
- FHLC 246K sh, better
- FMED 8.21K sh
- FHLC $88.53
- FMED $32.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FHLC | FMED |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | C52 |
| Mission | A81Higher | B68 |
| Risk | A79Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | C54 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | C48 |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. FHLC and FMED are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FHLCA
FMEDC
In short
FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.
FMED Fidelity's stock-picking take on health care: roughly 60 global companies its managers judge to be disrupting medicine. Actively run, deliberately concentrated, and priced right at the median fee for broad health care funds.
Stated mandate
FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.
FMED The fund seeks long-term growth of capital and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of disruptive medicine companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FHLC vs FMED Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FHLC vs FMED Cost
Overpaying FMED vs FHLC
$8,206
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FHLC 0.084%
$1,773
FMED 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FHLC | FMED | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $900 | $746 |
| 20 | $603 | $3,460 | $2,857 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $9,979 | $8,206 |
- 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
- 0.50%FMED
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
FMED 12th cheapest of 25 funds
FHLC vs FMED Dividends
- FHLC 1.15%, better
- FMED 0.00%
- FHLC $1.02
- FMED None
- FHLC $0.25
- FMED
- FHLC Sep 18, 2026
- FMED
- FHLC Sep 22, 2026
- FMED
- FHLC Quarterly
- FMED
Distribution history
FHLC vs FMED Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FHLC 14.5%, betterFMED 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FHLC 0.83, betterFMED 0.71
- Worst fall
- FHLC −17.7%FMED −21.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FHLC 0.59FMED 0.77
FHLC and FMED in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
